Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

easyJet quietly drops ‘Hands Free’ and its ‘you can’t use the overhead lockers’ cabin bag policy

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

There are many contenders for the title of ‘most stupid airline policy ever’, but easyJet’s new baggage policy – which launched this February – was in strong contention for a medal.

The airline banned passengers on standard tickets from bringing on larger bags which would have to go in the overhead locker. This was potentially acceptable if the benefit was sold as an extra, but it wasn’t.

Anyone who turned up at the gate with a large piece of hand baggage had to pay £55 to put it in the hold.

easyJet has also dropped its ‘Hands Free’ service which let you check in your hand baggage and which tended to be cheaper than paying for a seat which allowed a free cabin bag.

easyJet quietly abandons its ludicrous 'hands free' cabin bag policy

Change 1: easyJet will now allow large carry-on bags, if you pay

Under the current easyJet policy, which launched in February 2021, the only passengers allowed to bring larger bags onto the aircraft were those who paid for ‘Up Front’ (ie to sit in the first few rows) or extra legroom seats.

There were also exceptions for easyJet Plus (see our review of easyJet Plus here) and FLEXI fare holders.

This led to the ludicrous situation where the overhead lockers in the front of the aircraft were overflowing with hand baggage because anyone who refused to check in their bag had no choice but to pay for ‘Up Front’.

The overhead lockers in the rear of the aircraft were empty.

What happened if you turned up at the gate with hand baggage?

It was impossible to pay to bring a piece of hand baggage on board if it wouldn’t fit under your seat (45cm x 36cm x 20cm).

If you turned up at the gate with a bag which could not fit under the seat in front, you were charged £55 to place it in the hold.

Don’t believe me? Here is what easyJet published at the time:

easyJet quietly abandons its ludicrous 'hands free' cabin bag policy

Passengers who would have willingly (well, perhaps not willingly) paid an extra few £ for the ‘privilege’ of putting a bag in the overhead locker could not do so. They had to buy the full ‘Up Front’ package as you can see here:

easyJet quietly abandons its ludicrous 'hands free' cabin bag policy

You weren’t necessarily able to buy ‘Up Front’ if you wanted to

‘Up Front’ seats were capped at between 42 and 63 per flight.

This meant that, even if you were willing to book an ‘Up Front’ seat in order to bring hand baggage into the cabin, you may not have been able to do so.

Once the ‘Up Front’ and extra legroom allocation was gone, that was it. No additional passengers would be allowed to bring larger pieces of hand baggage onto the aircraft, even if willing to pay.

You can now pay to take larger pieces of hand baggage on board

With, unsurprisingly, zero publicity, easyJet has scrapped this idea.

The new easyJet hand baggage policy is outlined here.

You can still buy ‘Up Front’ and extra leg room seats, which will include the ability to bring a larger bag on board for free.

For everyone else, you can now add a large piece of cabin baggage by paying for it during booking or later via the easyJet app. You cannot add a cabin bag via the website yet.

Prices allegedly start at £5.99 each way. That said, comments below suggest that the actual cost is £15+ each way, albeit that £15+ is still cheaper than the typical £30+ cost of ‘Up Front’.

Change 2: easyJet has dropped ‘Hands Free’

I never saw the point of ‘Hands Free’, but some readers did find it useful. easyJet would let you check in your hand baggage for £7 and give you free priority boarding on top. You could book a ‘family bundle’ which reduced the cost to as little as £2.67 per bag. ‘Pay monthly’ customers on the ‘3’ mobile network got the service for nothing at one point as part of a tie-up with the airline.

‘Hands Free’ was initially available on a walk-up basis at the airport, but was later changed to require pre-booking.

British Airways Globe-Trotter BOAC suitcase

It was sold to passengers on the basis that they could experience the freedom of walking around the airport without a bag in their hands, or on their shoulders. The real benefit was that it was cheaper than booking an ‘Up Front’ or emergency exit row seat (a requirement to bring a bag into the cabin) and also cheaper than paying to check in a large suitcase.

‘Hands Free’ worked best for people who had small 55cm suitcases (the largest size allowed for ‘Hands Free’) which did not contain laptops and who were happy to queue at a bag drop on departure and wait at baggage reclaim after landing. It was also useful if you were carrying liquids.

It didn’t work well if you had a soft cabin bag (the risk of damage from checking it in was too high), if you were carrying IT equipment which was too fragile to check-in or if you were looking to minimise the time spent hanging around at the airport.

‘Hands Free’ has now gone as this page of the easyJet website confirms.

Conclusion

Banning passengers from bringing larger items of hand baggage on board, even if they were willing to pay to do so, was a strategic mistake. It opened up clear water between British Airways and easyJet.

My wife, for example, is not allowed to check in her work laptop. It must stay with her at all times. If she wanted to take an easyJet flight and there were no ‘Up Front’ or extra leg room seats available, she couldn’t book it. There was no other way of being allowed to bring the bag onto the aircraft, plus a handbag, since her employer would not pay the premium for a flexible ticket.

At the same time as easyJet was stopping you bringing larger items of hand baggage, British Airways was reintroducing free water and light snacks on short-haul flights, along with the launch of the Tom Kerridge pre-order food menu.

By removing the ability to pay to put a bag in the overhead bins, easyJet also put itself behind low cost rivals Ryanair and Wizz Air. It’s hard to understand how easyJet ever allowed this policy to come to market in the first place.

Comments (151)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Scottydogg says:

    Glad they have changed it , not still not as good as when they would let you bring a decent sized carry on for free .
    Brought it in during Covid when most people were not travelling so when they resumed travelling they didn’t know of the change and got stung at the gate .
    People remember stuff like this for a long time so will probably have looked elsewhere for flights they have booked recently

  • Gormlesstraveller says:

    Ryanair often charge £10 for basic fare.
    A 55*40*20 cabin bag is often an extra £20, whether bought on board or checked in.
    A full suitcase not much more, eg £25.

    Seems to be the way it’s going that the baggage costs more than the ticket, but still good value. Consider that the Frankfurt taxes are €46.10 yet a Ryanair ticket is less than that!

    • Peter K says:

      Basically, Ryanair knows that most people will not buy just a “ticket”.

      They keep their headline rate is low to draw punters in then they make their money on extras. That’s why baggage costs more than the ticket.

  • Anon says:

    Does anyone know a decent flight search site where you can factor in how much baggage you want to take?

    Skyscanner and the like throw up the cheapest flights regardless of baggage allowance and it’s super complicated to work out how much extra bags are. Fares with no baggage allowance are increasingly common even on long haul and each airline has its own rules and fees some charging per ticket some for individual flight legs.

    I see Kayak has something to add bags but I found it doesn’t really work. I guess it’s not easy when airlines have policies as daft as this Easyjet one. Any tips?

    • Blair says:

      With LCCs you end up having to very nearly complete a dummy booking process to get an indicative figure for comparison. I just have no interest, flying business with a connection in Frankfurt or Munich gets me anywhere I want to go in Europe at the times I want to travel (especially home late on a Sunday night) for £300-350 consistently. I don’t bother looking to the LCCs. Life’s too short.

      • Czechoslovakia says:

        This. Plus Zurich….

      • Qrfan says:

        Isn’t life too short for connections on short haul routes though? It only takes a weather delay, a missed connection and you’re missing work on Monday.

        • Blair says:

          Lockdowns and the move to working at home/remotely have transformed the potential for short holidays for some of us lucky enough.

      • Ian_H says:

        Try Kiwi.com it lets you add bags and seats and is fairly accurate in the comparison

        • Js says:

          you can search on kiwi and book for cheaper elsewhere, also some flights are missing, and bagage fees could be inflated

      • Anon says:

        I’m guessing LCC means Low Cost Carrier here.

        What is a low cost carrier these days? Most of the legacy airlines are having to match most of Ryanair’s creative ‘unbundling’ tactics just to sell economy tickets these days. Even on long haul the cheapest economy fare a flight search will throw up is one with no baggage allowance quite often.

    • David D says:

      I know at one point, one of the flight search engines were looking to build out an extras list to view an overall cost of a flight. Don’t think they ever managed to get it to get through testing yet.

    • Dubious says:

      Try momondo.co.uk on the Desktop site.
      The search results have a filter option to specify the baggage as part of the fare results.

  • Terence Page says:

    We flew from Malaga to Bristol with a miniature case on EJ no problem, on our return to Malaga they charged us £25 it turned out 1mm oversized, we try to abide by the rules
    Just a crazy rip off!

  • John T says:

    “My wife, for example, is not allowed to check in her work laptop. It must stay with her at all times. If she wanted to take an easyJet flight and there were no ‘Up Front’ or extra leg room seats available, she couldn’t book it. There was no other way of being allowed to bring the bag onto the aircraft, since her employer would not pay the premium for a flexible ticket.”

    A laptop bag can go under the seat in front and can therefore he brought onboard by all passengers.

    This is one of the most confusing, misleading articles I’ve ever read on this site.

  • Richie says:

    Do easyJet’s customer service respond well in their chat function on the app?

  • Flavio says:

    I have been flying with easy jet for the last 15 years, as my favourite airline… this was before the cabin bag policies that they have brought early this year, which has made me have second thoughts on ever using easy jet for any future flights.
    I am now open to pay more money to travel with other companies, than to agree with these strategies from easy jet.

  • Brighton Belle says:

    +1 . . . .I used to drive from Brighton to Luton to get Nice flights when Stelios had just 4 planes. EZY has lost the plot on baggage charges. It’s neither low cost or a simple ticket purchase now they want to roll you over on baggage sizing and the rest of it. I don’t need waste my time faffing around with their petty price structures.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.