Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

easyJet quietly drops ‘Hands Free’ and its ‘you can’t use the overhead lockers’ cabin bag policy

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

There are many contenders for the title of ‘most stupid airline policy ever’, but easyJet’s new baggage policy – which launched this February – was in strong contention for a medal.

The airline banned passengers on standard tickets from bringing on larger bags which would have to go in the overhead locker. This was potentially acceptable if the benefit was sold as an extra, but it wasn’t.

Anyone who turned up at the gate with a large piece of hand baggage had to pay £55 to put it in the hold.

easyJet has also dropped its ‘Hands Free’ service which let you check in your hand baggage and which tended to be cheaper than paying for a seat which allowed a free cabin bag.

easyJet quietly abandons its ludicrous 'hands free' cabin bag policy

Change 1: easyJet will now allow large carry-on bags, if you pay

Under the current easyJet policy, which launched in February 2021, the only passengers allowed to bring larger bags onto the aircraft were those who paid for ‘Up Front’ (ie to sit in the first few rows) or extra legroom seats.

There were also exceptions for easyJet Plus (see our review of easyJet Plus here) and FLEXI fare holders.

This led to the ludicrous situation where the overhead lockers in the front of the aircraft were overflowing with hand baggage because anyone who refused to check in their bag had no choice but to pay for ‘Up Front’.

The overhead lockers in the rear of the aircraft were empty.

What happened if you turned up at the gate with hand baggage?

It was impossible to pay to bring a piece of hand baggage on board if it wouldn’t fit under your seat (45cm x 36cm x 20cm).

If you turned up at the gate with a bag which could not fit under the seat in front, you were charged £55 to place it in the hold.

Don’t believe me? Here is what easyJet published at the time:

easyJet quietly abandons its ludicrous 'hands free' cabin bag policy

Passengers who would have willingly (well, perhaps not willingly) paid an extra few £ for the ‘privilege’ of putting a bag in the overhead locker could not do so. They had to buy the full ‘Up Front’ package as you can see here:

easyJet quietly abandons its ludicrous 'hands free' cabin bag policy

You weren’t necessarily able to buy ‘Up Front’ if you wanted to

‘Up Front’ seats were capped at between 42 and 63 per flight.

This meant that, even if you were willing to book an ‘Up Front’ seat in order to bring hand baggage into the cabin, you may not have been able to do so.

Once the ‘Up Front’ and extra legroom allocation was gone, that was it. No additional passengers would be allowed to bring larger pieces of hand baggage onto the aircraft, even if willing to pay.

You can now pay to take larger pieces of hand baggage on board

With, unsurprisingly, zero publicity, easyJet has scrapped this idea.

The new easyJet hand baggage policy is outlined here.

You can still buy ‘Up Front’ and extra leg room seats, which will include the ability to bring a larger bag on board for free.

For everyone else, you can now add a large piece of cabin baggage by paying for it during booking or later via the easyJet app. You cannot add a cabin bag via the website yet.

Prices allegedly start at £5.99 each way. That said, comments below suggest that the actual cost is £15+ each way, albeit that £15+ is still cheaper than the typical £30+ cost of ‘Up Front’.

Change 2: easyJet has dropped ‘Hands Free’

I never saw the point of ‘Hands Free’, but some readers did find it useful. easyJet would let you check in your hand baggage for £7 and give you free priority boarding on top. You could book a ‘family bundle’ which reduced the cost to as little as £2.67 per bag. ‘Pay monthly’ customers on the ‘3’ mobile network got the service for nothing at one point as part of a tie-up with the airline.

‘Hands Free’ was initially available on a walk-up basis at the airport, but was later changed to require pre-booking.

British Airways Globe-Trotter BOAC suitcase

It was sold to passengers on the basis that they could experience the freedom of walking around the airport without a bag in their hands, or on their shoulders. The real benefit was that it was cheaper than booking an ‘Up Front’ or emergency exit row seat (a requirement to bring a bag into the cabin) and also cheaper than paying to check in a large suitcase.

‘Hands Free’ worked best for people who had small 55cm suitcases (the largest size allowed for ‘Hands Free’) which did not contain laptops and who were happy to queue at a bag drop on departure and wait at baggage reclaim after landing. It was also useful if you were carrying liquids.

It didn’t work well if you had a soft cabin bag (the risk of damage from checking it in was too high), if you were carrying IT equipment which was too fragile to check-in or if you were looking to minimise the time spent hanging around at the airport.

‘Hands Free’ has now gone as this page of the easyJet website confirms.

Conclusion

Banning passengers from bringing larger items of hand baggage on board, even if they were willing to pay to do so, was a strategic mistake. It opened up clear water between British Airways and easyJet.

My wife, for example, is not allowed to check in her work laptop. It must stay with her at all times. If she wanted to take an easyJet flight and there were no ‘Up Front’ or extra leg room seats available, she couldn’t book it. There was no other way of being allowed to bring the bag onto the aircraft, plus a handbag, since her employer would not pay the premium for a flexible ticket.

At the same time as easyJet was stopping you bringing larger items of hand baggage, British Airways was reintroducing free water and light snacks on short-haul flights, along with the launch of the Tom Kerridge pre-order food menu.

By removing the ability to pay to put a bag in the overhead bins, easyJet also put itself behind low cost rivals Ryanair and Wizz Air. It’s hard to understand how easyJet ever allowed this policy to come to market in the first place.

Comments (151)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Jonas says:

    This seems to be another costly rip off masquerading as a victory for those who want to take their bags in the cabin. For a trip for 6 I’ve already booked I was expecting to pay a further £32 for hands free. Now looking at £240 for the same sized bags to go in the cabin. Complete rip off.

  • Sue says:

    They need to make some money back from all the money they’ve lost in the pandemic. Their flights are pretty cheap anyway. Just comparing a flight to Amsterdam and it was £96 with Easyjet and £431 with KLM. I know who I would choose

  • Sam says:

    Allowing carry on suitcases/larger items on board has always slowed things down, be it boarding or disembarking. If you travel frequent enough you will be familiar with the wait and queues in front of the aircraft door due to people blocking the aisle when loading their carryons. I see Easyjet has been trying to reduce the use of overhead lockers but, due to the design of narrow body aircraft there’s almost no way to avoid it apart from allowing extra turnaround time on ground.

  • Mark says:

    Yes awful policy. My hand luggage was ok flying out to Alicante. However coming back I was told it was oversize. I was then charged 29 euros before i could board. Only explanation I got was there was no spaces left in the overhead lockers. Surprise surprise when I got seated there was still loads of locker space. Im still waiting on an explanation. Even cabin crew were sympathetic.

  • Lady London says:

    It was so ridiculous and mean to introduce that policy that I wondered at the time if it was just Part One of a “3 card lady trick”. In other words, this was something so bad that it was just intended to make us feel better about a later policy to be introduced that would mean passengers were going to be asked to pay even more on average per seat later ie now.

    Remember that when they changed to this policy around February, Easyjet was operating very, very few flights. I know this, because I’ve played whack-a-mole with Easyjet since May 2020, and still now this month November 2021, trying to find Easyjet flights to travel on the days I need to.

    Mostly they’re not running my flights enough days any more so the flights are just not there to book. But the whack-a-mole is on repeated occasions across months, seeing a flight in the schedule and planning around it, over and over when coming to book, that flight has disappeared. Or the flight changed time to a different part of the day. Then a few weeks later, the flight disappears leaving no flights that day. And a gap of 5 days, or 7 days, till the next one. This cost me the loss of a contract that was offered and accepted last July. Because the client knew I would generally fly Easyjet but the schedules kept changing and disappearing, and they weren’t used to people flying to them at all, much less being aware that someone is used to problems when flying and would sort it out, even flying British Airways or Lufthansa if they had to.

    I’m also pretty sure that if Easyjet cancelled your flight then you’d keep whatever luggage you had a right to on the original flight, if you chose the option to rebook to a later date on the same route regardless of the seat you landed in. Though seat reservations should move with the flight too if same route is kept.

    • Lady London says:

      I also wondered why Easyjet would have wanted most cabin luggage in forward rows for the balance of the plane – surely this would push the nose down.

      • Pete1968 says:

        You need the weight up front. It won’t push the nose down 🙂

        • Pete1968 says:

          Well, sometimes more evenly distributed but in my experience nearly always more up front:

          https://simpleflying.com/aircraft-weight-and-balance

        • Lady London says:

          Then why did Ryanair block the front 1/3rd or even the front 1/2 of the plane’s seat rows on lightly loaded planes when I used to fly with them, saying it was for load distribution and cramming everyone in the back. Were they testing an early version of the 737MAX? (that they’ve now apparently purchased but they’re calling it something else)

          • Nick says:

            @LL you just never made it far enough back! They used to do 3 or 6 rows at the front and the same at the back, cramming everyone into the middle (where the best trimmed COG is on the 738). Jetstar do the same but they differentiate on price… cheapest fare = crammed in, slightly higher fare class = spaced out a bit.

  • CS says:

    Wow! £31 per bag for hand luggage EDI to BER in Feb 2022! Flight was only c£50!!

    • Brian W says:

      I’ve just booked EDI – LGW, flight £36.99 and the large bag cost was £26.99 🤷🏼‍♂️ No rhyme nor reason that I can see.

  • pigeon says:

    I’ll miss hands free…an excellent way to bring wine back from Europe after a weekend trip. Now HMRC is delighted that I’ll have to have the wine delivered…

    • Lady London says:

      I couldn’t possibly comment on this strategy.
      Other than to say it works for olive oil too

  • Mrs S Mitchell-Gears says:

    I was about to start using hands free, as I am 75yrs & part disabled with a walking stick & a small handbag, so paying for my cabin bag to go hands free, would have worked well, how am I now going to left my case into the above lockers, with a stick & small handbag, so what will happen I will be holding up people behind me, & EasyJet say you could put it in the hold, prices from £5.99, well in the nearly 20yrs travelling with them I have never seen that price, my hold case price is around £34 each way at the moment.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.