Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

US drops the requirement for a negative Covid-19 test for entry

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

The White House announced this afternoon that it was dropping all Covid-19 testing requirements for air travellers arriving into the US.

The rule had required all arriving air passengers to present a negative supervised antigen test before boarding their flight.

A negative test has been required for entry into the US by air since January 2021. This relaxation of the rules will initially only be in place for 90 days, at which point a further decision will be made on whether it should continue.

US drops requirement for covid testing on entry

To be fair, the test requirement itself was not expensive (it is a cheap antigen test, not a PCR) or onerous (you could take it in the full calendar day before travelling, and results were normally available within 30 minutes). You could even take the test via video link, as Rhys did before his trip to Atlanta this week.

That said, the requirement to test did create negative sentiment towards travel, especially as airlines moved to drop or weaken their Covid-19 cancellation or change policies. British Airways announced this week that it would no longer allow changes or cancellation of non-refundable tickets bought from Wednesday onwards.

The new rules will come into place from first thing on Sunday, although the exact timing – is it based on departure or arrival? – is yet to be clarified. This is unlikely to be an issue if flying from the UK, of course, since I don’t think there are any US flights which depart whilst it is still the previous day in the arrival city.

Sean Doyle, British Airways’ Chairman and CEO said:

‘We’re thrilled that our customers will finally be able to travel hassle-free to the 26 destinations we fly to in the US, without the need to take expensive and onerous tests. With the summer holidays fast approaching, customers can try out our new routes to Portland and Pittsburgh, popular destinations like Austin and New Orleans, and firm favourites like New York and Los Angeles.’

A Virgin Atlantic spokesperson said:  

“The removal of pre-departure testing for international arrivals to the US is welcome news. It will boost consumer confidence even further and support the rebound in transatlantic travel this summer, with Virgin Atlantic leading the way offering a full roster of US destinations, including our brand new London Heathrow – Austin service.  

“Frictionless transatlantic travel in both directions means reconnecting with loved ones and business colleagues is made even easier, supported by an onboard policy which allows our customers and people to make a personal choice on face masks. We can’t wait to see more of our customers flying with us to the US this Summer.” 

You can find out more at CNN here which broke the story.

Comments (88)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Anon says:

    Since all this nonsense started I’ve only ever paid for one COVID test and then used the template for this to make ones for future travel. I do my own lateral flow tests regularly and just didn’t want the hassle every time I travelled. What’s amusing is the QR code on Randox tests doesn’t actually link to your results, it’s just a bunch of text embedded in the code. So if you scan it then it’ll say “This is an officia Randox test results for blah blah blah dob xx/xx/xxxx ID 0099999 result: negative. So you can create your own QR code with similar text embedded to make it look official (nobody ever did scan it though).

    Basically these tests were pointless as each country had their own rules and there was no standard format for the results so as long as they contained the required words (e.g. PCR, Antigen, supervised, etc) and negative and looked official they’d be accepted.

    I didn’t want to write this when testing was still required as I didn’t want anyone getting into trouble but now I don’t think many more places need it (none where I want to go) I thought I’d show what a farce it was. I saved a few thousand not doing these tests.

    • Kowalski says:

      Many people were doing this.

    • WaynedP says:

      Congratulations 👏

      You have successfully followed the example of the UK’s Prime Sinister (and some likeminded henchmen, like Cummings and Hancock) and feasted on the benefits of social order and cohesion while simultaneously spurning any notion of shared solidarity and co-responsibility to anyone other than yourself.

      You must feel awfully proud, it’s truly one to pass on to your children and grandchildren and undoubtedly the way to build a better society.

    • WaynedP says:

      I’m betting that Anon wouldn’t recognise the hypocrisy of banging on to local authorities and UK consulate officials about his/her human rights being infringed if arrested and detained in a foreign country for manufacturing fraudulent documents 🙄

    • Lady London says:

      So how many people more vulnerable than you were you transmitting the virus to, whilst you were travelling alll around whikst pleasuring yourself?

      I am very close to breaking a rule of politemess here for your lying, deceitful, illegal, senseless and above all selfish behaviour.

      All I’ll say instead of calling you better words is : next time I’m at an HfP Party, please come up to me and introduce yourself so I can punch you in the nose.

      • WaynedP says:

        Now, now, LL, as tempting as that might first appear, you know as well as I do that proponents of the principles means having to abide by the principles ourselves; otherwise we too simply join the unprincipled in the dung heap of squandered integrity.

        That means seeking behavioural change through education, using words as our only weapons.

        You cannot change someone’s mind by beating them senseless, believe me I belonged to a regime that joined a long list of history’s failures in this regard.

        The only chance we stand is by revealing Truth and trusting in some vestigial sense of decency to ultimately triumph.

        Besides, it’s still right to afford Anon the benefit of the doubt when he/she claims to have self-tested. They haven’t amassed the credibility deficit of you-know-who just yet.

        It would be nice to get you a drink at the 10th HfP party and talk you out of any residual leanings you may harbour towards physical violence 🙂🍷🙂

        • Lady London says:

          🙂 I just wanted to do something viscerally satisfying. Unfortunately the balcony at the Renaissance isn’t high enough to toss him over

  • Ali B says:

    Suffered a covid test to come here only because I had a 2-4-1 voucher due to expire. It was ridiculous that they insisted on this rule for so long and for the first time I couldn’t look forward to a trip due to the uncertainty involved

    Can’t really expect much better from the worst administration in US history.

    • John says:

      Say that to the immigration officer’s face

    • Ian M says:

      Indeed, who’d have thought when the Trump administration imposed this 18 months ago we’d only just be seeing the back of it now. They did achieve some positive things though, apparently.

    • ChrisC says:

      So you chose to go to the US?

      In which case follow their rules!

  • Peter says:

    There is definitely a lot of COVID around, but the problem is there is no way to record it. Can’t get any NHS tests anymore and the £2 ones from Boots can’t be reported.

    • Blair Waldorf Salad says:

      No recording of cases, no case stats. No case stats = no SAGE/Imperial College/the dastardly duo of Whitty & Valance calling for another lockdown, ably abetted by the media who failed to make monkeypox a thing

      • Kowalski says:

        Exactly. The obsession with testing was delaying life getting back to normal. Covid is no worse than the flu by this stage, and for most people no worse than a cold.

      • Brian P says:

        we’re party of the ons study, we’re getting tested tomorrow at 4pm..

    • Tracey says:

      Plenty people have boxes of tests, secured when the NHS was willingly posting them on request. Mine expire in varying dates towards the end of the year. Some people no doubt also have NHS PCR tests.

  • Linda P says:

    We are next travelling on the 9th September so not sure if this falls within the 90 days next announcement. Will the attestation form also be dropped.

  • Olivia says:

    Flying this morning to Boston – argh! Just missed the deadline…

  • Andy C says:

    I am flying to Boston tomorrow (so therefore do not need to do the test I’d booked for later today). But the VeriFly app is still insisting that proof of a negative test must be uploaded together with the attestation which still includes that I’ve had a negative test). Any advice? Should I forget about VeriFly and just turn up to the airport with my vaccination proof?

    • NorthernLass says:

      It’ll be interesting to see whether the airlines have managed to update their systems since the announcement – I can foresee a few cases of “computer says no”. Let us know how you get on and have a great trip.

  • Ken says:

    I was wondering about that too. The US and Canada are losing a huge number of potential tourists, not only from the UK either. Countries like Germany and Sweden only have around 75% vaccination rate. There is certainly no logical reason why the US is holding out on this issue.

  • Nicky says:

    Good news. I fly to Miami on Friday, test booked but not a waste of money as I am taking a cruise on Saturday and they still insist on testing, so no change for me.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.