Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

American Express brings back a minimum income requirement for its cards

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Back in 2016, American Express removed the minimum income requirements from its UK personal and small business cards.

The plan was to take a more holistic view of your finances. A single person living at home on a £25,000 salary has a totally different disposable income profile to someone who is married with two kids and a mortgage taking home £35,000.  Setting a strict cut-off level was seen as a blunt instrument.

For whatever reason, potentially linked to new FCA customer duty regulations, American Express has decided that this structure was no longer workable.

American Express uk minimum income to get a card

Minimum income requirements have now returned.

That said, they are not exactly tough. Someone on minimum wage doing 40 hours per week will still qualify for most cards. The real losers are the retired and non-working partners, as the requirement is based on your personal income. High savings or a high household income are no longer enough.

These are the new PERSONAL income requirements.

It’s worth comparing these numbers to the 2016 levels, remembering that we’ve probably seen 25%+ wage inflation since then.

The Platinum Card was £40,000 in 2016 but is now £35,000. The Marriott Bonvoy American Express was £30,000 in 2016 but is now £20,000.

The only big jump is the British Airways Premium Plus card, which was available on a £20,000 income in 2016 but now requires £35,000.

The other personal cards were £20,000 in 2016 and remain at £20,000 now, so the income requirement is far lower in real terms.

For HfP readers, these limits are unlikely to make much difference to those in work but are likely to hit the retired or those applying on behalf on non-full time working partners or their student children.


earns points from credit cards

Want to earn more points from credit cards? – April 2025 update

If you are looking to apply for a new credit card, here are our top recommendations based on the current sign-up bonuses.

In 2022, Barclaycard launched two exciting new Barclaycard Avios Mastercard cards with a bonus of up to 25,000 Avios. You can apply here.

You qualify for the bonus on these cards even if you have a British Airways American Express card:

Barclaycard Avios Plus card

Barclaycard Avios Plus Mastercard

Get 25,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £10,000 Read our full review

Barclaycard Avios card

Barclaycard Avios Mastercard

Get 5,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £20,000 Read our full review

You can see our full directory of all UK cards which earn airline or hotel points here. Here are the best of the other deals currently available.

American Express Preferred Rewards Gold

Your best beginner’s card – 30,000 points, FREE for a year & four airport lounge passes Read our full review

British Airways American Express Premium Plus

30,000 Avios and the famous annual 2-4-1 voucher Read our full review

The Platinum Card from American Express

80,000 bonus points and great travel benefits – for a large fee Read our full review

Virgin Atlantic Reward+ Mastercard

18,000 bonus points and 1.5 points for every £1 you spend Read our full review

Earning miles and points from small business cards

If you are a sole trader or run a small company, you may also want to check out these offers:

American Express Business Platinum

50,000 points when you sign-up and an annual £200 Amex Travel credit Read our full review

American Express Business Gold

20,000 points sign-up bonus and FREE for a year Read our full review

Capital on Tap Pro Visa

10,500 points (=10,500 Avios) plus good benefits Read our full review

Capital on Tap Visa

NO annual fee, NO FX fees and points worth 1 Avios per £1 Read our full review

British Airways American Express Accelerating Business

30,000 Avios sign-up bonus – plus annual bonuses of up to 30,000 Avios Read our full review

Comments (234)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Paul says:

    Could this be a form of indirect discrimination? Woman will be disproportionately impacted due to potential few working years and therefore lower pensions.

    • Maples says:

      Every other CC provider is also doing this, then, though with lower requirements. Premier bank accounts are probably the one you should go after.

    • BBbetter says:

      Tail wagging the dog. Should push for higher income for women rather than asking banks to relax income criteria.

      • AL says:

        +1 to @BBbetter. Wage transparency and equality is important on the grander, societal scale.

        • Mike says:

          We already have equality, you are asking for something else (which is undesirable).

          • _aDifferentSimon_ says:

            Not universally! The only lady in our weekly management meeting is the pa.
            2023 or 1973!? My team is >50% women but childcare years still seem to impact women disproportionally in pretty much every aspect of life including senior positions. I do work in an old school insurance company so perhaps my view is worse than the norm!

          • novelty-socks says:

            Could you please elaborate on what would be undesirable?

          • Roy says:

            There is a lot of evidence that we don’t.

      • Ryan says:

        Please don’t tell me you actually think people are paid more / less based only off gender. If it were true, no company would hire another male again

        • Mike says:

          Of course I can elaborate. It would be a demand for equity, that would be undesirable, we already have equality which is a superior concept. Equity is a disgusting and awful concept (and that’s without the people it kills).

  • Ian says:

    Seems it wi probably only catch out those who are retired, but I assume Amex Would be fine if you can demonstrate you have are retired and have pension and other investment income to the level required

    • AJA says:

      Rob commented above that investment income is unlikely to count.

      • Yorkie Aid says:

        Just because Rob says something doesn’t necessarily mean it’s true. I have only had private investment income for 20 years. Haven’t been turned down yet.

        • Rob says:

          If you just put your invesment income down as total income then clearly they don’t know. You are asked to confirm that you ‘earn’ £20,000 per year which seems to imply ‘from employment’.

          • Yorkie Aid says:

            I get your point Rob. I like to think I’ve “earned” my income from sensible capital allocation but I suppose others may disagree. Time will tell I guess 🙂

          • Richard T says:

            I always read “earn” as what have I declared as income on my tax return. This includes a mix of investment income, dividends, pension, self employment etc, and I assume is what Amex are actually asking for.

          • Roy says:

            There’s a big difference between having £35,000 of investment income and being able to comfortably draw £35,000 p.a. capital from your investment portfolio.

            One problem many people might face is that much of their portfolio is invested for capital growth rather than income. But if you are genuinely receiving £35,000 of investment income (i.e. from interest/dividends/distributions) then I suspect that Amex would be happy to have you as a customer.

  • Keely says:

    Well this leaves me as a part time public sector worker just under the limits (no clapping please, apparently I’m not one of the heroic ones…). And I’m on my two year break . Which means unless we get a very decent pay rise (unlikely ) I’m out. Time to rethink strategies…..

  • Jill Kinkell says:

    I’m a retired NHS member, just under the threshold. Had the Amex BAPP card for just shy of 20 years …I’ll be hanging on to it! OH also retired NHS can take his pick… after I tell him what to do! Seems BA and Amex don’t want the little people

    • AJA says:

      As long as Amex doesn’t retroactively apply the income limits to existing card holders. If they do then you will lose that BAPP card. So will many others.

      The article isn’t clear on whether that is what Amex will do. But be prepared…

  • Alex G says:

    It’s not just the income thresholds, Amex have tightened up on new cards. I have held Amex cards continually for 10 years. I frequently took out new cards for sign up bonuses or referral bonuses. Currently hold BAPP and ARCC. Applied for the Nectar card last week and was turned down. No reason given, but rightly so TBH. People like me – and most on here – have been taking the mickey long enough.

    I’m retired with pensions of £33k and some interest on savings and occasional paid work. (Household income is just over £80k.) I’ll be hanging on to the two cards I’ve got. Would hate to lose the BAPP. However, I will probably be putting more spend through Barclaycard now instead of Amex. If Amex had given me a third card, I would have used it.

  • BBbetter says:

    Lots of irate pensioners on here today.
    “We paid our NI contributions. How can you take away our entitlement to churning the platinum card?”

  • Alfie says:

    Does anyone know when these limits will come into effect?

    Apologies if I’ve missed it in the article. I was made redundant in November last year and have only recently got back on the job hunt after taking some time out to do a professional qualification course.

    If the new limits are imposed at the start of the new billing/annual fee cycle (or next tax year) I suspect I’ll be fine, but if they come in abruptly I doubt I’ll be able to keep hold of my Platinum.

    Thanks

    • Rob says:

      Yesterday. Does not impact existing cards.

    • LilysDad says:

      Sorry if I missed it, but is this with immediate effect?
      My student son is off travelling through Switzerland next month and I had planned on adding him as an additional cardholder so he can have fun on me.
      Am I too late?

  • Rui N. says:

    This discussion is a good opportunity for HfP to expel the riff raff that cannot comply with such low numbers of income. It detracts from the ambience of the website. When I started reading the figures I thought they were weekly income. At least Farage might be able to get a credit card.

    • AirMax says:

      I know right, some of these people even stay in Travelodges

      • Mike Hunt says:

        My company travel policy is no travel at all unless justified the meeting can not be conducted remotely. If travel authorised Travelodge only (must be located up to a 30 min car drive (hire car not taxi) of the required destination. Premier Inn only if proof that no Travelodge is available within a 30 min car drive. I don’t travel much any more !!

      • Rui N. says:

        Yuck. I’ll need to take a shower now.

    • sloth says:

      Farage probably only has the Amex Nectar card

      • Mike Hunt says:

        I would definitely sign up for any bank / financial institution offering the “Farage Card”

        • Rui N. says:

          I imagine the Farage Card takes stuff away from you every time you use instead of giving rewards?

          • Lady London says:

            Yes. BA is moving to the new method whetr you pay them both ways. You fly, paying money for that, snd then you pay for your own miles (that they used to pay you)..

            Isn’t this what Avios Subscription and Avios Booster is about?

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.