Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

British Airways goes aircraft shopping – what will replace its Boeing 777 fleet?

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Last week, Bloomberg reported (paywall) that British Airways and Iberia parent International Airlines Group (IAG) was in contact with Airbus and Boeing about further widebody aircraft purchases.

These days fleet decisions are made at the group level, with each airline having to make their case to IAG as to why they deserve investment in new aircraft.

In theory pooling orders should allow for better bulk discounts with manufacturers, although in reality IAG does not seem to make the same gigantic single-order purchases that are often announced by other airlines. A recent top-up order of six Boeing 787-10s for BA is indicative of this.

The current shopping spree, however, appears to be solely for BA, with Bloomberg reporting that “IAG is seeking to replace older 777s at its British Airways unit.”

This shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone. If anything, it’s surprising that it has taken this long.

With covid travel restrictions a thing of the past, airlines all over the world have been racking up orders for hundreds of aircraft as they try and replace the capacity they lost during covid. With BA’s Boeing 777-200ER fleet nearing an average age of 24 years (some are turning 27 soon) it was only a matter of time.

British Airways BA A350 in flight

BA’s fleet before and after covid

Prior to the pandemic, British Airways operated 135 long haul aircraft comprising:

  • 32 Boeing 747-400 (275-337 seats)
  • 45 Boeing 777-200ER
  • 12 Boeing 777-300ER
  • 12 Boeing 787-8 (214 seats)
  • 16 Boeing 787-9 (216 seats)
  • 1 787-10 (256 seats)
  • 12 A380 (469 seats)
  • 5 Airbus A350-1000 (331 seats)

Things changed dramatically during covid, with the retirement of all 32 Boeing 747s in July 2020. That singlehandedly wiped out 23% of its long haul fleet and a larger percentage of its overall capacity, given that the 747s were some of their largest aircraft by seat count.

British Airways 747

Since then, the long haul fleet has recovered slightly with the arrival of further A350s and 787-10s. Fundamentally, however, BA remains a smaller airline than it was in early 2020 with just 122 aircraft as of October 2023:

  • 43 Boeing 777-200ER
  • 16 Boeing 777-300ER
  • 12 Boeing 787-8 (214 seats)
  • 16 Boeing 787-9 (216 seats)
  • 7 787-10 (256 seats)
  • 12 A380 (469 seats)
  • 16 Airbus A350-1000 (331 seats)

Still to arrive are two more A350s, completing the fleet with 18 aircraft, as well as 11 more 787-10s. Also on order are 18 Boeing 777-9X, the next generation 777, now due to arrive no earlier than 2026.

Once all firm orders are delivered, it would leave the long haul fleet at 153 – just shy of 20 aircraft larger than in early 2020.

Of course, this does not take into account the increasing age of the Boeing 777 fleet. The earliest examples will be turning 30 in just a few years; the youngest in the fleet will be 21 by 2030.

Whilst BA has long had an older fleet (Virgin Atlantic’s average aircraft age is half that of BA, at around 7 years) it cannot fly these aircraft indefinitely. Maintenance checks will get increasingly expensive whilst fuel costs are only likely to rise.

Further on the horizon you’ll also find the retirement of the A380 fleet. The oldest of these turned ten this year, so they still likely have a good 10-15 years in them at least.

There’s no doubt then that BA needs some new aircraft, and preferably soonish.

What’s on the menu, British Airways?

For now, there is no indication as to which direction BA will go. It appears that discussions are ongoing with both Airbus and Boeing and engine manufacturers Rolls Royce and GE.

It seems the order is for at least 20 aircraft, according to Bloomberg.

BA already has a diverse long haul fleet so it is exceptionally unlikely that it will add a new aircraft type. This leaves the 787, 777X or A350 as the likeliest options.

In terms of capacity, BA is currently refurbishing its Boeing 777-200ER fleet with its new business class cabins. These aircraft feature between 235 and 272 seats overall; about half of them feature a First cabin with eight seats, hence the lower overall seat count.

Looking at seat counts, the most obvious replacement would be the 787-9 (216 seats), 787-10 (256 seats) or the A350-900.

Whilst BA doesn’t operate this variant of the A350 yet, it is part of the A350 family which BA already flies. In fact, the A350-900 may be the closest replacement in terms of capacity. Other airlines such as Singapore Airlines, Finnair and IAG sister airline Iberia feature between 250 and 350 seats on this aircraft in a three cabin configuration, so it would be a very close proxy to the existing 777-200ERs.

One other option, of course, is to go bigger. With Heathrow capacity constrained, the only way for BA to grow is to increase the size of its aircraft or operate more flights from other airports. The former is more attractive as it allows BA to retain the connectivity it has at Heathrow for transiting passengers.

In this case, the choice would be between the 787-10, A350-1000 and the 777-9X.

The 777-9X is arguably too big, although BA could opt for its smaller sibling, the 777-8X. The difference between the A350-1000 and the 787-10, at least in terms of capacity, is very small: the biggest differences here are the range and cargo capacity, with the A350-1000 capable of flying much further and/or carrying more cargo.

Range, however, is not a key metric for BA: the majority of its flights are less than 11 hours, which the 787-10 can handle perfectly fine. It would require a significant change in strategy for the A350’s range to come into play – not likely given BA’s increasing focus on North America in the past few decades.

There are other considerations, of course. Price and availability will also likely be a key factor. Boeing has recently signed a number of blockbuster deals with airlines including Riyadh Air and Air India for hundreds of 787s. It is struggling to ramp up production as quickly as Airbus has for the A350 following the pandemic, so availability may be constrained for some time.

At the same time Airbus, keen to win some widebody orders back from Boeing, may offer persuasive pricing to sweeten the deal.

Conclusion

This is all speculation, of course.

Whilst it seems clear that more aircraft will be needed, there are no concrete details on which way British Airways will walk. If anything, it will also be using this coverage as a negotiating tool to eke out improved deals from Airbus and Boeing.

Either way, the first aircraft from this potential order aren’t likely to arrive for another 3-4 years at the earliest. When it does, it will be a huge improvement for passengers with a lower cabin altitude across all models helping to reduce jet lag. All three aircraft also feature larger windows.

In the short term, we have the remaining A350 and 787-10 deliveries to look forward to, as well as the completion of the Boeing 777 Club Suite refurbishment which is likely to wrap up in the coming months. This will allow BA to get started on the 787-8s and A380s Club Suite refurbishments.


How to earn Avios from UK credit cards

How to earn Avios from UK credit cards (April 2025)

As a reminder, there are various ways of earning Avios points from UK credit cards.  Many cards also have generous sign-up bonuses!

In February 2022, Barclaycard launched two exciting new Barclaycard Avios Mastercard cards with a bonus of up to 25,000 Avios. You can apply here.

You qualify for the bonus on these cards even if you have a British Airways American Express card:

Barclaycard Avios Plus card

Barclaycard Avios Plus Mastercard

Get 25,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £10,000 Read our full review

Barclaycard Avios card

Barclaycard Avios Mastercard

Get 5,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £20,000 Read our full review

There are two official British Airways American Express cards with attractive sign-up bonuses:

British Airways American Express Premium Plus

30,000 Avios and the famous annual 2-4-1 voucher Read our full review

British Airways American Express

5,000 Avios for signing up and an Economy 2-4-1 voucher for spending £15,000 Read our full review

You can also get generous sign-up bonuses by applying for American Express cards which earn Membership Rewards points. These points convert at 1:1 into Avios.

American Express Preferred Rewards Gold

Your best beginner’s card – 30,000 points, FREE for a year & four airport lounge passes Read our full review

The Platinum Card from American Express

80,000 bonus points and great travel benefits – for a large fee Read our full review

Run your own business?

We recommend Capital on Tap for limited companies. You earn 1 Avios per £1 which is impressive for a Visa card, and the standard card is FREE. Capital on Tap cards also have no FX fees.

Capital on Tap Visa

NO annual fee, NO FX fees and points worth 1 Avios per £1 Read our full review

Capital on Tap Pro Visa

10,500 points (=10,500 Avios) plus good benefits Read our full review

There is also a British Airways American Express card for small businesses:

British Airways American Express Accelerating Business

30,000 Avios sign-up bonus – plus annual bonuses of up to 30,000 Avios Read our full review

There are also generous bonuses on the two American Express Business cards, with the points converting at 1:1 into Avios. These cards are open to sole traders as well as limited companies.

American Express Business Platinum

50,000 points when you sign-up and an annual £200 Amex Travel credit Read our full review

American Express Business Gold

20,000 points sign-up bonus and FREE for a year Read our full review

Click here to read our detailed summary of all UK credit cards which earn Avios. This includes both personal and small business cards.

Comments (114)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

    Whilst overall LHR capacity is constrained BA has a number of slots it has currently leased / loaned out to other airlines – including to its competitors – that it could recall and start operating itself once it has the planes to use along with pilots, cabin and ground crew etc.

    And it might want to consider building out T5C to its full extent so it has the gate capacity as well.

    • Paul says:

      T5C suffered from the “cheap” mindset at Heathrow in the early 2000 leading to it being cut back and the use of very long jetties. Still it could be worse, many staff areas still look unfinished 15 years on!

    • Phillip says:

      The expansion of T5C was all part of the 3rd runway plan, which may be resurfacing sooner than some expect!

  • SteveJ says:

    I wonder which union pay deals the 787 Vs A350 pilots are on respectively. If not the same as one another this may drive some of BA’s thinking.

    • Rhys says:

      I don’t think the fleets are split out by the unions. Imagine if they were – pilot v pilot!

  • BJ says:

    Seems much more likely to be Boeing given current fleet and history. I doubt they have any intention of going with the a350 and they’re just using this to get the Boeing price down. A pity IMO as I find the a350 is the nicer aeroplane to fly. The 787 is fine but I find the cabin less-pleasing, it does feel like I’m on a smaller airplane and there is something about the shape, size and position of the windows that I just don’t like. As long as it’s not 77X I don’t really mind. Based on Bowing track record over the last two decades it would be no surprise to me were the 77X beset with issues on entering service. On the bright side, any issues will lijely be resolved before BA ever gets them since they’re already late to the fleet renewal party.

  • NigelthePensioner says:

    By the time BA have kitted out their old 777’s with club suite, the last of them will probably only have a weeks flying left in it. BA124 last night had 4 out of 8 seats in row 10 faulty to some degree or another. One of them actually had the 13 amp mains socket just hanging by its wires!! Just as well there were only about 40 passengers on the entire flight!!

    • Paul says:

      Makes you wonder what else is hanging on! Pretty desperate state of affairs

    • Mark says:

      Pretty much all of them have been now. Three 777-300ERs left to go (plus one being done at the moment) but those are much younger, albeit with cabins in a poor state. The one you’re talking about is one of three oddball 777-200ERs that were refurbished with old Club World in 2018 for Gatwick, but flying from Heathrow since the decision to cease offering F on any Gatwick flights and to make up the numbers at Heathrow. Unclear if they will ever get Club Suite (the 3 class aircraft based at Gatwick probably never will).

    • Rhys says:

      They’ve almost finished. Only a couple of (Heathrow) 777s left to do 🙂

  • Opus says:

    My speculation? More 787-10s

    20-30 seats bigger than the 200ER
    Carry significantly more cargo than both the 350-900 and 200ER
    Its profitability and economics are top of the pack on routes less than 5000nm which is about 90% of BAs long haul flying.

    • Rhys says:

      The 787-10 does not carry significantly more cargo than the A350. If anything it is significantly less!

      • Opus says:

        The 787-10 carries more cargo than the 350-900.

        787-10 carries 13 pallets of cargo whilst the 350-900 is only 11 pallets.

        It’s a simple Google.

        The 350 can lift more payload but if you know about cargo you in vast majority of cases max out from volume first.

        • Opus says:

          So in other words. It Physically cannot fit more cargo than a 787-10. That’s why it dominates Asian regional market.

      • jjoohhnn says:

        It depends what you are looking at. The A350-900 can take more cargo in terms of weight, the 787-10 can take more cargo in terms of volume with capacity for more LD3 containers.

        When you see cargo planes take off they usually go up like ‘sxxt off a shovel’ as they are so light. More volume is probably more valuable.

        • Rhys says:

          Cargo planes benefit from not having hundreds of passengers and their baggage, however!

          • Opus says:

            Air freight generally still maxes out due to volume and not weight. Same concept still applies

          • jjoohhnn says:

            But on cargo planes, using containers on the upper deck you can load more cargo in and use up all that empty space (aisle, breathing space, knee room) that passengers don’t use, but still cargo planes are way lighter, which is why being able to carry more volume is more valuable than more weight as in the 78X vs 359.

        • Max says:

          More volume is not everything though. If that was the case, we’d seen the A380Freighter by now. At least as aftermarket conversion of second hand jets.

          • Opus says:

            380F failed because airbus couldn’t really make it make sense for the users and the delay in the 380 as a whole also pushed off the customers. Combine that with the financial crisis in 2008, 380F was toast

          • jjoohhnn says:

            Yes, having the ability to carry a large volume in a plane constructed to carry the higher weight and the necessary overheads of that doesn’t stack up! If it was redesigned for the volume rather than weight then it might work. It would probably have been better with two engines. Maybe they could turn two off during cruise?!

    • Fred says:

      The 350 is a much better aircraft and Airbus know it. They therefore don’t discount it that much and Boeing are desperate to bag orders.

      With the 6 787-10 IAG were about to order 350s and Boeing through in a late, too good to leave, offer. Hence 6 787s not 350s.

      • Opus says:

        Boeing desperate to bag orders? The 787 continues to outsell airbus’ entire widebody portfolio every single year and is on track to do so this year with almost 100 orders ahead of airbus’ entire widebody orders
        On the narrow body side sure airbus continues to dominate and Boeing will have to lower price to win orders but don’t think for a second it’s replicated on the widebody side. . On the widebody side? Boeing continues to wash airbus, and that’s with half its portfolio not in service. The 787 alone is single handedly competing against the 330neo and 350 and it is winning because it is more flexible and easily adaptable. Spanning 3 distinct market sizes. Yes 350 maybe nicer to fly on but when it comes to the decision makers? The market has clearly spoken.

  • Karl says:

    Gatwick based 777s are not due to be furbished. They are some of the oldest. Proves Gatwick is low in the thoughts of BA.

    • Rhys says:

      That’s always been how it is. It’s fundamentally a leisure operation.

      What I imagine we will see is that Gatwick gets some Club Suite hand me downs from Heathrow once that fleet is back to size.

      • Mark says:

        Perhaps, although the oldest 200ERs are Heathrow based. Given their age I would think it likely they will start to be retired once the 777-9s finally start arriving and BA has an excess of LH aircraft at Heathrow.

  • Patrick C says:

    For the customer the A350 is miles ahead of any boeing competition. Boeing is also doing screw up after screw up and there is still no 777-X to be seen anywhere. Further delays and shoddy manufacturing are extremely likely.
    Thus really, the A350 should be the only option given the slot constraints. The problem is, BA’s management focuses still mainly on immediate costs and ignores forgone revenue.
    I would negotiate a cheap deal with Boeing on the 777-X, then go to airbus and get a goof price on the A350 and buy it. You can add some 777-X options to the order for relationship management.

    • Opus says:

      Except IAG and RR can’t find a way forward, which is why I expect them to go with Boeing for widebodies for the 100th time and also ditch RR in the process – 787

    • Richie says:

      re “…The problem is, BA’s management focuses still mainly on immediate costs and ignores forgone revenue…” This is spot on. The problem is the ‘remove olive from salad’ example for cost saving will crop up for decision makers until the end of time.

    • Bernard says:

      The A350 in club is about the worst cabin possible. Over dense layout, hopelessly small galley, insufficient loos, and that makes meal services slow and difficult. It’s yet another symptom of Alex Cruz’s appalling lack of proper thought other than cheap as possible.

      • Rhys says:

        The layout is the same as Club Suite on the 787 or the 777. It’s the same seat! Same density. Galley is an issue but that has nothing to do with density – just poor planning!

  • Paul says:

    Bring back the 747!
    It does surprise me that no one has developed an aircraft along the lines of the Queen of the skies. I am no aircraft designer but from a passenger stand point absolutely nothing beat the nose section of a 747, and it didn’t need a door on it!

    • BahrainLad says:

      The nose section layout of the 747 would now never be certified – regulators insist on new designs for the ability to exit from both the front and rear of each cabin section. The 747-8 only gets away with it because of grandfathered rights.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.