Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

UK Government bails out Hungary’s Wizz Air with £300m – whilst Virgin Atlantic is turned down

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Doing a bailout quickly and fairly is not possible, unfortunately.  There will always be holes in the system.

As we have covered before, Virgin Atlantic is not able to access the Government’s coronavirus borrowing facility due to a technicality.  Any business which has issued tradeable debt can borrow from it.  Businesses which have not issued tradeable debt cannot.  easyJet has tradeable debt and got £600 millionIHG also took £600 million yesterday despite not needing it.  Virgin Atlantic has no tradeable debt.

Wizz Air has been approved for a soft loan of £300 million

Virgin Atlantic may not be able to borrow from the UK Government, but Hungary’s Wizz Air can.

It has put out a statement to the Stock Exchange stating that the UK Government has given it permission to draw down money from the Bank of England’s Covid Corporate Financing Facility.

The exact amount will depend on Wizz Air’s financial status but, given the F3 rating it holds from Fitch, it should qualify to borrow £300 million at an interest rate of just 0.6%.

I thought Wizz Air didn’t need money?

It doesn’t.

Wizz Air is the financially strongest airline in Europe.  As I mentioned in our Lufthansa article on Saturday, an analyst report from Citi last week estimated that Wizz has enough cash in the bank to survive for 22 months without flying.  This assumes that it repays all outstanding ticket holders IN CASH and continues to pay all of its bills on time.

Wizz Air is borrowing a potential £300 million from the UK Government because it is dirt cheap money.  It has no need for the funding.  The money will, most likely, to be used to repay more expensive bank and bond debt.

How can a Hungarian company borrow £300m at 0.6% from the UK Government?

Companies are allowed to borrow from the Covid Corporate Finance Facility, according to the Bank of England website, if:

In practice, firms that meet this requirement would normally be: UK incorporated companies, including those with foreign-incorporated parents and with a genuine business in the UK; companies with significant employment in the UK; firms with their headquarters in the UK. We will also consider whether the company generates significant revenues in the UK, serves a large number of customers in the UK or has a number of operating sites in the UK. 

Whilst its head office and management team are based in Budapest, Wizz Air is listed on the London Stock Exchange because its domestic stock market is too small and illiquid.  It also has a UK operating subsidiary which is the legal operator of the ten aircraft it bases in the UK.

You can see the Stock Exchange announcement here. 

Given the relatively soft criteria for accessing this money, as long as you have traded debt, Wizz Air may not be the last foreign airline to seek a UK-funded bailout whilst Virgin Atlantic teeters on the brink.

PS.  The UK Government will make a profit on this loan, of course, assuming that Wizz Air survives.  The current 3-year UK Government bond yield is 0.1% so there is a profit to be made by raising money to lend to Wizz Air at 0.6%.

Comments (204)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Nick_C says:

    Wizz are exploiting a scheme that is widely available. They are not being selected for a bail out or getting any special treatment.

    Frustrating, but an inevitable consequence of making taxpayers’ money readily available to businesses who need it quickly to stay afloat.

    The alternative would be to watch companies that might have profitable futures and pay corporation tax go bust and make large numbers of people redundant.

    No point in worrying over things about which we have no control.

    • J says:

      Yes agreed better to just moan about Beardie.

    • Cam says:

      +1

    • Riccatti says:

      It’s hard to argue though that Wizz business model remains working, while Virign’s model proven unsustainable.

      Company can’t stay afloat if there is no clear path to paying its debts (let alone profitability).

  • insider says:

    Was it a technicality as you state in your article, or was it that Virgin can’t raise investment grade debt?

    • Nathan says:

      Agreed.
      Tuesday thought experiment: in your made-up public ratings agency, let’s call it Red Cords Ratings LLP, where on a scale of C to AAA would you place Bearded Wonder Airlines?

    • Lady London says:

      Is not making profits in 10 years a technicality apart from very few years in which almost negligible profits were declared given turnover.

      Not sure if Virgin forgot to issue some bonds or if the market feedback was they were too high a risk so would have been too expensive to issue.

      • ken says:

        I’m on furlough from the BA special operations team from today, but keep up the good work Lady London.

        • Rob says:

          Sorry to hear that Ken. Bit unfair that Marc got kept on and you weren’t.

        • Cal says:

          Are BA topping up the furlough pay beyond the /£2500 a month cap? Dirty tricks can’t cheap 🙂

          • Rhys says:

            They are

          • mr_jetlag says:

            They are. Dirt cheap, in fact.

          • ken says:

            No top up I’m afraid but it was only part time. Then again, as Mark Twain said;

            Find a job you enjoy doing, and you will never have to work a day in your life.

  • JJ says:

    Since there is so much fuss about Branson’s tax arrangements, can someone in the know please enlighten us as to how much UK tax Wizz Air actually pays. According to Wizz Air Holdings annual report they are a company registered in Jersey who are tax resident in Switzerland, where they pay a nice low rate of tax. They are also largely owned by US private equity firm Indigo Partners.
    I’m no particular fan of SRB but his employees have paid plenty of UK tax and NI for years and now the govt. hands over £300 mill to a bunch of johnny come latelies.
    As a UK taxpayer feeling pretty mugged right now…

  • Spaghetti Town says:

    Would this work in Virgins favour? Why was Virgin turned down for a loan anyway? I know it hasn’t made money for years.

    • Rob says:

      As per the article, only companies which have rated, tradeable debt (issued as bonds) can access these loans. All of Virgin’s debt is bog-standard bank borrowings and so it doesn’t qualify.

      • Spaghetti Town says:

        @ Rob – Ahh yes i remember you saying now. I thought Virgin would of at least had some trade able bonds. Even Heathrow Limited does.

        • insider says:

          EVEN Heathrow Ltd? Their existence depends on them!!! As a monopoly regulated business, their debt is actually more highly rated than the individual airlines, given generally it has guaranteed returns within a collar when there isn’t a pandemic going on.

    • J says:

      BA will be lobbying the government and urging against any help for Virgin. Branson as a socially liberal Remainer is hardly their model entrepreneur either (if James Dyson now based in Singapore was asking for a loan I’m sure he’d have got it).

      • Rob says:

        I think you’re wrong and we have an article lined up explaining why. There is a VERY good reason why BA requires Virgin Atlantic to stay afloat which explains why Willie Walsh is surprisingly quiet. He was all over the papers saying that Flybe should be allowed to die, remember. Why is he so quiet now? There is a very good reason which most of us haven’t spotted to date (including me, until it was pointed out.)

        • J says:

          Looking forward to reading it 🙂 my mind can be changed.

        • Lady London says:

          Was that to do with ,what you hinted yesterday about the Transatlantic JV AA-BA-IB-AY being no longer justifiable if Virgin was no longer around to provide nominal competition to the cartel

          • Rhys says:

            Bingo

          • Kruggs says:

            hmmmm I wonder what the market would look like if Virgin disappeared. I suspect DL would step up to add some additional flying, so maybe the impact on Europe-N.America market share wouldn’t be huge. I suspect maybe a few more slots would have to be offered up as remedies, but I doubt they would break up the JV.

            Anyway I look forward to you article, particularly the market share analysis – without this it’s just speculation

          • Lady London says:

            I’d like to see more of Delta operating to the UK. Wonder if it would work for easyJet to the up with them?

          • Lady London says:

            *tie up as a feeder

          • Mikeact says:

            Might upset KL/AF.

          • Mikeact says:

            @Rhys. Breaking news…BA likely to have lose 25% of their workforce.

          • Mikeact says:

            Even worse, figure revised, a third of the workforce

          • Riccatti says:

            Delta can step up with Transatlantic flights but not very soon, ie in 2022. Before that a case can be made about BA-AA-et al JV.

    • insider says:

      It all goes back to the original problem – in the views of the debt markets, Virgin would almost certainly have been rated junk. BA, which I think we can confidently say is a much more stable company than Virgin (pre and post Covid), is/(was) only just rated a notch above junk.

      Wizz, which I would say is an even more stable company than BA, has investment grade debt.
      Therefore this doesn’t work in Virgin’s favour. It just demonstrates the relative positions of Virgin vs. other airlines that can use this scheme – the government is relatively confident that it will get the money back off these airlines. However would you want to lend money to Virgin right now, when you have the founder saying it will run out of money next month without aid?

      • J says:

        What’s £500 million for Virgin anyway or £300 million for Wizz? Does anyone really think the government is going to pay all this money back?

        • insider says:

          the government or the companies? I’m pretty sure these government loans have a term of 1 year, so yes I’d expect the companies to be paying them back!

          • Riccatti says:

            Companies with traded debt will pay back the Government (or restructure), else its hair trigger to all their other debt!

            It’s not all the credit rating.

  • Chrish says:

    If everybody on here lent Virgin the Money say, 20% of profit from turnover or if earning 20% of wages after tax deductions ect with Virgin saying they will pay you back when in reasonable profit
    Virgin would survive another year lol
    Just a thought to give another laugh to the lovers n haters on here lol

    • jamie says:

      Good idea – crowdfunding with a bung of FC miles included 🙂

      • Lady London says:

        Maybe HMG is onto something. They could lend money to any investment grade corporate worldwide at 0.6%. Let’s make maximum term 1 year or a plan that renews at a higher rate after that with some sort of equity kicker if the corporate does well.

        Print the money on demand as required.
        Create an entirely new domestic currency alongside the external currency for the above because otherwise the domestic economy gets trashed.

        HMG is already one of the world’s biggest arms dealers so why don’t we just print money and become the world’s bank?

        • Alex W says:

          What’s the defence industry got to do with it. You want people to buy their equipment from Russia instead?

  • FCP says:

    Anybody remember 2009 after the financial crisis when SRB wanted BA to fail?

    ‘We and others are standing by ready to take on their routes and runway slots at Heathrow if they get into serious trouble.“

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1194579/Virgin-boss-Richard-Branson-urges-Government-bail-British-Airways.html

    • J says:

      What’s your point? BA oppose state aid now but will be asking for it as soon as/if Virgin go bust.

    • Cal says:

      I hope you are never tied to an opinion you held 10 years ago. The world would be a significantly better place if we were all able to change our minds.

  • MJ says:

    Rob surely just bevause the yield of a 3y gov bond is 0.1% that does not mean the government is paying 0.1%

    The base rate is 0.1% therefore I assume the coupon rate on the 3y bonds is a fair bit higher, its just that investors have pushed up the price.

    So the government isn’t really borrowing at 0.1% over 3 years.

    Hell even 12m GBP Libor is almost 0.9% I don’t see why a company like Wizzair should get a considerably better rate than that

    • Rob says:

      New debt is issued tied to the current yield. It is paying higher interest on older debt, but these loans are being funded by newly issued debt so arguably it is a straight match.

      • tony says:

        The government sold £3.6 billion of 2024 debt last Wednesday yielding 1%. Average price paid was £103.494 per £100 issued, giving a yield of just 0.123%. It was 2.5 times covered too, so plenty of demand.

        • will says:

          It’s easy to generate demand when you print the money. Currently £645bn of money borrowed by the UK government to pay it’s bills has been printed by the BofE (aka UK government).

          I could live a great lifestyle if I was allowed to print money and borrow it at 0.1-0.2%.

          I might even decide on repayment date to swap the loan for a new one 😉

          If anyone had suggested this back when I did A level economics the teacher would have found it laughable and muttered something about inflation.

        • PAUL VICTOR TEMPERTON says:

          Thank you for making that clear. It is indeed surprising that bond arithmetic, specifically the calculation of the gross redemption yield, is not widely understood.Even more simply: you pay £103 to the government now, it gives you back £100 in three years, which wipes out (just about) your coupon income of £1 a year for three years.

      • MJ says:

        Conversely the last 3 year gov bond auction was on 7th April. Coupon rate was 0.125% but sold below par meaning a YTM of closer to 0.2% so not too much higher I guess.

        However I still think its ridiculous that the gov is lending money at such low rates to business that may not need the money and may just be scraping an IG rating.

  • AS says:

    Could we get this article translated for those of us who are not stockbrokers or hedge fund managers?!

    • Ryan Berry says:

      If I (gov) offer to borrow £100 at 10%, the the repayment will be £110 easy

      But if you are prepared to pay £105 me £105 for the privilege of having £110 in a year then the interest isn’t 10% but 4.76% (£5 / £105) (I think the maths is right there)

    • jc says:

      Could you clarify which part? I’m not a stockbroker or hedge fund manager and found the article very plain English & straightforward to understand.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.