Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

easyJet quietly drops ‘Hands Free’ and its ‘you can’t use the overhead lockers’ cabin bag policy

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

There are many contenders for the title of ‘most stupid airline policy ever’, but easyJet’s new baggage policy – which launched this February – was in strong contention for a medal.

The airline banned passengers on standard tickets from bringing on larger bags which would have to go in the overhead locker. This was potentially acceptable if the benefit was sold as an extra, but it wasn’t.

Anyone who turned up at the gate with a large piece of hand baggage had to pay £55 to put it in the hold.

easyJet has also dropped its ‘Hands Free’ service which let you check in your hand baggage and which tended to be cheaper than paying for a seat which allowed a free cabin bag.

Change 1: easyJet will now allow large carry-on bags, if you pay

Under the current easyJet policy, which launched in February 2021, the only passengers allowed to bring larger bags onto the aircraft were those who paid for ‘Up Front’ (ie to sit in the first few rows) or extra legroom seats.

There were also exceptions for easyJet Plus (see our review of easyJet Plus here) and FLEXI fare holders.

This led to the ludicrous situation where the overhead lockers in the front of the aircraft were overflowing with hand baggage because anyone who refused to check in their bag had no choice but to pay for ‘Up Front’.

The overhead lockers in the rear of the aircraft were empty.

What happened if you turned up at the gate with hand baggage?

It was impossible to pay to bring a piece of hand baggage on board if it wouldn’t fit under your seat (45cm x 36cm x 20cm).

If you turned up at the gate with a bag which could not fit under the seat in front, you were charged £55 to place it in the hold.

Don’t believe me? Here is what easyJet published at the time:

easyJet quietly abandons its ludicrous 'hands free' cabin bag policy

Passengers who would have willingly (well, perhaps not willingly) paid an extra few £ for the ‘privilege’ of putting a bag in the overhead locker could not do so. They had to buy the full ‘Up Front’ package.

You weren’t necessarily able to buy ‘Up Front’ if you wanted to

‘Up Front’ seats were capped at between 42 and 63 per flight.

This meant that, even if you were willing to book an ‘Up Front’ seat in order to bring hand baggage into the cabin, you may not have been able to do so.

Once the ‘Up Front’ and extra legroom allocation was gone, that was it. No additional passengers would be allowed to bring larger pieces of hand baggage onto the aircraft, even if willing to pay.

You can now pay to take larger pieces of hand baggage on board

With, unsurprisingly, zero publicity, easyJet has scrapped this idea.

The new easyJet hand baggage policy is outlined here.

You can still buy ‘Up Front’ and extra leg room seats, which will include the ability to bring a larger bag on board for free.

For everyone else, you can now add a large piece of cabin baggage by paying for it during booking or later via the easyJet app. You cannot add a cabin bag via the website yet.

Prices allegedly start at £5.99 each way. That said, comments below suggest that the actual cost is £15+ each way, albeit that £15+ is still cheaper than the typical £30+ cost of ‘Up Front’.

Change 2: easyJet has dropped ‘Hands Free’

I never saw the point of ‘Hands Free’, but some readers did find it useful. easyJet would let you check in your hand baggage for £7 and give you free priority boarding on top. You could book a ‘family bundle’ which reduced the cost to as little as £2.67 per bag. ‘Pay monthly’ customers on the ‘3’ mobile network got the service for nothing at one point as part of a tie-up with the airline.

‘Hands Free’ was initially available on a walk-up basis at the airport, but was later changed to require pre-booking.

British Airways Globe-Trotter BOAC suitcase

It was sold to passengers on the basis that they could experience the freedom of walking around the airport without a bag in their hands, or on their shoulders. The real benefit was that it was cheaper than booking an ‘Up Front’ or emergency exit row seat (a requirement to bring a bag into the cabin) and also cheaper than paying to check in a large suitcase.

‘Hands Free’ worked best for people who had small 55cm suitcases (the largest size allowed for ‘Hands Free’) which did not contain laptops and who were happy to queue at a bag drop on departure and wait at baggage reclaim after landing. It was also useful if you were carrying liquids.

It didn’t work well if you had a soft cabin bag (the risk of damage from checking it in was too high), if you were carrying IT equipment which was too fragile to check-in or if you were looking to minimise the time spent hanging around at the airport.

‘Hands Free’ has now gone as this page of the easyJet website confirms.

Conclusion

Banning passengers from bringing larger items of hand baggage on board, even if they were willing to pay to do so, was a strategic mistake. It opened up clear water between British Airways and easyJet.

My wife, for example, is not allowed to check in her work laptop. It must stay with her at all times. If she wanted to take an easyJet flight and there were no ‘Up Front’ or extra leg room seats available, she couldn’t book it. There was no other way of being allowed to bring the bag onto the aircraft, plus a handbag, since her employer would not pay the premium for a flexible ticket.

At the same time as easyJet was stopping you bringing larger items of hand baggage, British Airways was reintroducing free water and light snacks on short-haul flights, along with the launch of the Tom Kerridge pre-order food menu.

By removing the ability to pay to put a bag in the overhead bins, easyJet also put itself behind low cost rivals Ryanair and Wizz Air. It’s hard to understand how easyJet ever allowed this policy to come to market in the first place.

Comments (149)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Bill says:

    Hands free was £16 for up to 6 passengers on the same booking. It was an excellent option. The prices to take the larger cabin bag on board are so out of kilter with Ryanair. It’s quite astonishing

    • Lady London says:

      £15-£16 for handsfree for up to 6 passengers travelling together was strangely annoying for single travellers being asked to pay £7.

  • Yorkieflyer says:

    I have a couple of existing bookings, dates moved, which were booked prior to the removal of the free large cabin bag. We were then offered by email Hands Free included as an alternative.
    They had better honour this.

    • Bill says:

      The easyJet website says they will

    • Charlie says:

      Sorry I posted a similar question further down,I fly Sunday so will confirm.
      May try EJ Flying Club to confirm this

  • Bill says:

    MAN-AGP 9 April, quotes £32.49 for a large cabin bag. WTF

  • Hayley Deves says:

    Strange. I’ve just tested out this theory buy going onto the easyjet app and booking flights. It’s still the same?!?! …ok I’m puzzled now.

    • Bill says:

      I’m checking prices via existing reservations in the app and selecting Add Extras. I haven’t tried a new booking

  • Charlie says:

    What about if you booked your flight pre rule changes 11Th Feb 21 ? I have emails that I can use hands free at EJ plus checkin for free by showing this email.I have previously done this to my advantage ie checking in liquid I would not have been able to carry on board.Where do I stand with this I next Fly EJ 7th Nov on a flight I booked pre baggage changes so was hoping to use hands free again but sounds like no longer an option ?
    Anybody advise ?

  • Colin says:

    Would love to know the £5.99 route? easyJet`s shortest flight is BFS/IOM at 74 miles …… cost of hand luggage is £14.99pp in January – the depths of `low season.`

    • Sam G says:

      £17.99 pp from Lanzarote at Xmas. We’ll probably just stick with sharing a couple of hold bags TBH at least you don’t have to worry about liquid restrictions!

  • TimM says:

    “The airline banned passengers on standard tickets from putting bags in the overhead locker.”

    “The only passengers allowed to put a bag in the overhead lockers were those who paid for ‘Up Front’ (ie to sit in the first few rows) or extra legroom seats.”

    Completely wrong. The difference between those allowed the larger bag size and those not was just that – size. No one was prevented from putting the smaller cabin bag in the overhead locker! easyJet’s language is designed to graphically convey the maximum size of the smaller cabin bag – that it should fit under the sea in front, not that it must be placed under the seat in front!

    “Anyone who turned up at the airport with a large piece of hand baggage had to pay £55 to put it in the hold.”

    No, if they turned up at the *gate* with more or larger cabin baggage than their allowance, easyJet reserved the right to stow it in the hold and make a charge of £55. This is not too different to any other airline.

    “EDIT: We have edited the article to remove references to ‘Hands Free’ which was not the name of the easyJet baggage policy. The ‘Hands Free’ service has also been removed but this is not what we are discussing here.”

    Even after the edits and apologies, this is an appallingly-written article not even worthy of the Sun. It attempts to make a mountain out of a molehill and fails miserably due to an incorrect premise supported by misleading and incorrect suppositions which could have been easily fact-checked by a 12-year old.

    What was its purpose? Generate clicks?

    • Rob says:

      You’re missing the point though. You can get virtually nothing into a 45cm bag – you may remember my Scooby-Doo trip to Porto last year. For a woman, you lose your allowance entirely because your handbag is treated as your small bag if you bring one. Whether it actually goes under the seat on the day is immaterial.

      Running easyJet coverage has absolutely zero benefit to us, I promise you. In any case, the two key ad slots today are directly sold to Amex for a fixed fee and even if we get 1m page views it makes no difference.

    • Js says:

      Sorry but this change IS a big deal

  • Js says:

    Selling my shares at the next pop, they ahve become very un-user friendly

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.