Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Expedia halts the roll-out of One Key – but it is too late for UK members

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Expedia Group, which primarily comprises Expedia, Hotels.com and rental site Vrbo, has halted the roll out of its new One Key loyalty programme.

The impact on bookings at Hotels.com has been so big that the company felt it had no choice but to stop.

Unfortunately, it is too late for members in the UK. The transfer of Hotels.com Rewards to One Key was already underway when the decision was taken. The US and the UK will be the only markets with One Key for the forseeable future.

Expedia halts the roll-out of One Key

This step back should not be a surprise for HfP readers. We had been predicting a weakness in Hotels.com bookings since the change was announced.

Under Hotels.com Rewards, you received 10% of the ex-tax value of your booking back in free night credits. The only snag is that you had to book 10 nights before you could cash out your reward.

Hotels.com Rewards worked well for a lot of people:

  • people who didn’t book enough hotel nights to earn status, or a worthwhile number of points, in any hotel loyalty scheme
  • people who were not prepared to compromise on location or hotel quality and always booked the most appropriate hotel for their trip, irrespective of brand
  • people who booked rooms for other people, or booked multiple rooms per trip, because Hotels.com Rewards paid you irrespective of the name on the booking
  • people who liked redeeming their rewards for larger rooms or suites, since the credit could be used against any room category – most hotel loyalty programmes restrict redemptions to standard rooms

Compared to this, One Key is an exceptionally poor programme. You only earn 2% back in OneKeyCash on the ex-tax value of your booking unless you have Hotels.com elite status. Your return has been cut by 80% compared to Hotels.com Rewards.

The only upside is that the 2% is immediately available to use – you don’t need to wait until you have done 10 nights to cash out.

Effectively, Expedia Group gambled. I suspect that:

  • it knew that it would lose the business of heavy bookers, for whom the 10% return was a big incentive and who had no problem booking the 10 nights required to trigger a reward
  • it thought that the loss of volume would be compensated with higher margins on the remaining bookings, since their spend on rewards dropped from 10% to 2% for no-status members
  • it thought it would attract some new casual customers who were attracted by the instantly available 2% return – light bookers are better off in the new structure, since the old scheme gave you nothing until you booked 10 nights

For various reasons, Expedia Group has now decided that it made a mistake.

Part of the issue is that, outside the US and UK, there are few countries where BOTH Expedia and Hotels.com are big players. If you’re not a user of both brands, and thus benefitting from earning and redeeming across both platforms, One Key is pure downside for most bookers.

Travel site Skift listened in to the quarterly earnings call last week and reported the following:

Expedia halts the roll-out of One Key

“Most international markets have only either Brand Expedia or Hotels.com operating at scale with limited Vrbo presence,” said Expedia Group CEO Ariane Gorin in her first earnings call running the show. “So we’re going to take the time to tailor our value proposition for these markets. In addition, this should minimize further near-term disruption to Hotels.com, which was the brand most impacted by One Key’s U.S. rollout.”

[…] Hotels.com was adversely impacted by the introduction of One Key in the U.S. and UK, officials said.

Chief Financial Officer Julie Whalen said Expedia.com was the least disrupted by the introduction of One Key, and it saw a robust 20% room nights growth in the second quarter.

“[….] with Hotels.com, when we moved to One Key, we sort of downplayed an advantage that Hotels.com had. It had a really big differentiator and its loyalty program (10 nights booked meant a free night),” Gorin said. “So the good news is that both of those brands have great brand awareness, have people who love to come back to them. But I’ve just realized it’s going to take work to get them back to where we want.”

Expedia Group has not broken out how poorly Hotels.com has been performing. What we do know is that Expedia.com saw a 20% increase in hotel room night bookings in the second quarter, but the TOTAL group number of hotel bookings was only up 10%. This means that Hotels.com must be flat at best.

What analysts didn’t seem to pick up on is that the Hotels.com figures are probably worse than they look. When accounts are transferred from Hotels.com Rewards to OneKeyCash, members see their outstanding partial rewards turned into a cash credit which encourages them to book.

For example, I was five nights towards my next Hotels.com Rewards free night. When my account was turned into OneKeyCash, this turned into $98 of credit. I am heavily incentivised to make my next hotel booking on Hotels.com to spend this credit which will boost their short term numbers – but once I’ve done that, I don’t see any reason to book with Hotels.com again.

The burning question is ‘What happens now?’.

Expedia Group cannot easily run two different loyalty schemes, depending on which country you live in. At the same time, going back to separate schemes would be very difficult now that Hotels.com Rewards credits have been turned into OneKeyCash.

I suspect that we will eventually see an overhaul of the earn rate at Hotels.com, moving it closer to the 10% return it was in the past – albeit with a discount to reflect the fact that you no longer need to do 10 nights to cash out.


best hotel loyalty promotions

Hotel offers update – April 2025:

Want to earn more hotel points?  Click here to see our complete list of promotions from the major hotel chains or use the ‘Hotel Offers’ link in the menu bar at the top of the page.

Want to buy hotel points?

  • Hilton Honors is offering a 100% bonus when you buy points by 29th May 2025. The annual purchase limit is also increased to 240,000 points pre-bonus. Click here to buy.

Comments (156)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • memesweeper says:

    Which country should I be opening my new hotels.com account in? Presumably one where hotels.com has a big market presence and they’ll be reluctant to change or experiment with?

  • John says:

    Given that you can change the name on hotels.com accounts whenever you like, and enter whatever name you like into the booking field, obviously you can earn stamps on anything

  • John says:

    It isn’t similar at all because avios prices are “fixed” whereas for hotels.com you need to find a hotel that is priced close to the average of the 10 stamps and then pay a bit extra, or if you want it totally free then you don’t get 9.1%.

  • Alex W says:

    I agree with Lumma. If you can effectively get a 10% discount on each booking, there’s no loyalty element. It just feels like the original price is 10% too high and they are trying to over-charge people!

    • TGLoyalty says:

      It probably was 10% too high. The rewards are paid from somewhere 😂

      • Jenny says:

        Possibly, but I started using Hotels.com because it was invariably cheaper than other sites or even booking direct.

        • Andrew says:

          I must have some bad settings then… it is very (very, very) rare that I find a Hotels.com price that is close to, never mind cheaper, than the direct member rate.

  • Tim416283 says:

    No surprises here, they’ve already lost out on around 15 bookings from me – like everyone else I’ve moved spend elsewhere

  • Simon says:

    I am today making my last ever Hotels.com booking, to use up my existing £700 of credit.
    It is not just the headline devaluation issue, there are other less obvious changes, eg:
    – the 6% for Plat members only seems to apply to a small minority of properties, most are limited to 2%, so ‘’status’ means very little
    – additional gold member perks seem to have been taken away – many of the hotels I would book would come with day $40 drink credit – these have all gone.

    Idiots.

  • Chris says:

    Not only did the reward devaluation suck, but they also removed their price match, which I’ve not seen anyone talk about! I’ve saved thousands on non-refundable bookings over the last three years with price match which I can’t do now.. anyone know if anyone else offers this?

  • Blenz101 says:

    I know everyone seems to be blaming marketing or accounts but for anybody who has been in the scheme a while they will remember that hotels.com for a number of years was sending out market research surveys with multiple different scenarios for tweaking the scheme.

    They would have also had huge amounts of data on how customers would react to various changes as well as analytics on engagement / loyalty behaviors from their customers.

    Coming off the cash back sites would have been fair enough, even removing the price match guarantee which seemed very generous would have been ok. To gut the rebate to customers whilst maintaining their own generous commissions is such an obvious two fingers up for what was supposed to be a loyalty scheme it was inevitably going to drive customers away.

    • TGLoyalty says:

      The secret discount did increase so standard got 10% then silver got 15% off and gold 20%

      Obviously it’s not working that way or there’s too few hotels offering the discounts or none of its customers are aware they are getting an extra 5/10% off

      • meta says:

        I remember a time 7-8 years ago when they ran genuine 50% off sales for gold members 2-3 times a year and most non-chain hotels were included.

    • Peter K says:

      I was involved in some of the market research for hotels.com charges. I can tell you now that what they have produced is nothing like what the consumers in my group suggested.
      We didn’t mind a lower % commission as long as there were other perks instead such as free breakfast, some airline lounge passes a year, guaranteed free room upgrades.

      They even presented various options at the end as comparisons (which is these two options do you prefer, multiple times with 10-15 different variations) but none as poor as what they have produced.

      They might have had huge amounts of data to work off, but it seems like they just made the final version worse than what was tested.

      • blenz101 says:

        Similar, I think this site may have even covered some of the potential options presented during the research at the time.

        Booking Holdings can hopefully step in a fill the hole left in the loyalty space for non-chain hotels.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.