Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

British Airways turns a corner with record punctuality in February 2025

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Sean Doyle’s turnaround of the airline appears to be bearing fruit, at least in terms of punctuality.

British Airways has swept into fourth position for punctuality amongst ‘global’ airlines and sixth place amongst all carriers in Europe. It had an on-time performance of 86.9% for February. This is using data on arrival times from Cirium, the aviation analytics company.

(If you’re wondering how you can be 4th in the world but 6th in Europe, the ‘global’ rankings are restricted to carriers which serve at least three continents. Small carriers are excluded from consideration on both lists.)

This is the first time in an ‘extended period’ that a UK airline has made Cirium’s Top 10.

British Airways improved punctuality

BA’s own numbers show that it achieved an average of 72.7% on-time performance for the whole of 2024 compared to 60.4% in 2023. The best result was in the first quarter of 2024, with an average 79.1% of flights departing within 15 minutes of the scheduled time.

The British Airways press office did not respond to requests for comment. However, in a message to staff, Tom Moran, Director of Heathrow for British Airways said performance at its Heathrow hub in February was even better than Cirium’s numbers.

Using BA’s definitions, the airline set a new punctuality record of 90% in February, beating the previous record of 89% set in April 2017 and the internal target of 80%. “We also hit our monthly target for baggage and in terms of customer connections, February was our best month since the pandemic.”

In the industry, ‘on time performance’ is considered departing or arriving within 15 minutes of schedule. A flight scheduled to depart at 15:00 would therefore be considered ‘on time’ if it departed at 15:14 or earlier.

You should note that, according to Flyertalk reports, part of the improvement in BA’s own numbers (as opposed to the Cirium data which is independently collected) is down to BA redefining ‘departure’. This is now captured when the parking break is released, and due to ATC delays or runway queues there is little connection between this and ‘wheels up’.

British Airways turns a corner with record punctuality

The Cirium data shows that the BA improvements are ‘real’, however. Other airlines in Cirium’s Top 10 Global Airlines include Aeromexico (92.87%), Iberia (91.25%), Qatar Airways (87.23%), Lufthansa (86.66%), Saudia (86.20%), Avianca (84.86%), Hainan Airlines (82.41%), LATAM (81.97%) and Emirates (80.76%).

British Airways has struggled with on-time performance since the pandemic when it let go tens of thousands of experienced staff. It has also had to scale back overly-ambitious summer schedules in recent years due to resource constraints.

What is driving the improvements?

British Airways has touted numerous investments it is making as part of a £7 billion investment strategy. Whilst the majority of that will be spent on replacement aircraft, a not insignificant amount has been spent on modernising its operational systems and IT services.

This includes a ‘full transition’ to ‘modern core operational systems’ as well as a brand new ‘Operations Control Centre’, both of which help staff to ‘make better, data driven decisions.’

The question now is whether British Airways can keep it up. Flight punctuality typically dips during the peak summer months as airlines push aircraft and schedules to their limits. This in turn reduces redundancy and the ability to recover quickly from adverse events such as poor weather, aircraft outages or air traffic control strikes.

British Airways turns a corner with record punctuality

Last year, British Airways suffered from a self-described ‘difficult’ summer thanks to air traffic control strikes and aircraft availability. Reliability of the twelve A380s in BA’s fleet was particularly poor and the airline operates a large fleet of Boeing 787s which have been dogged by Rolls-Royce engine issues.

There is light at the end of the tunnel. IAG CEO Luis Gallego said recently that Rolls-Royce is rolling out an engine durability package “very soon” which he hopes will “double the time on wing” or, in layman’s terms, the time before it needs substantial maintenance. British Airways is the only airline at IAG to operate Boeing 787s and Gallego said the improvements will be “very positive for the business.”

In truth, the figures for the whole of 2025 to date are less impressive.

Cirium data shows that BA’s performance in January 2025 was actually below that of January 2024. However, February was very strong and Rob’s flight back from the ITB travel fair in Berlin last Wednesday arrived 35 minutes early! Whether it is January or February which is the outlier will become clear in the coming months.

Sister airline Iberia also remains well ahead of BA with 91% punctuality in February.

If British Airways can keep the improvement up then year-end punctuality could be close to 80%, a marked improvement of 20 percentage points in two years. This would be a win for both the airline and its passengers – and no mean feat at a congested airport like Heathrow where the busier it gets, the harder it is to maintain on-time performance.

Comments (70)

  • Nick says:

    Padded schedules, inflated turnarounds, doctored departure metrics (to match what IB already do), low loads, and – crucially – no bad weather in what is often a very snowy month. Absolutely understand why they’re shouting about it (wouldn’t you?!) but they’re kidding themselves that it’s down to anything they’ve delivered.

    Summer will be a different story. Believe it or not, the ‘reliable’ schedule they’ve put together actually needs delays to work at all… it was created without input from Heathrow ops teams and there’s a fair bit of panic now (some) people have realised. Onwards and upwards!

    • memesweeper says:

      Padded schedules mean increased time on the ground (and thus improved puntuality) at outstations. This is good for consumers.

      • Rob says:

        Yes, I’m generally ok with it – at least I know when I’m getting there.

        I did check actually. My Berlin flight last Wed had a 2.05 block time. Eurowings doesn’t fly it but easyJet, to Gatwick, is 2.00 and to Luton is 1.55.

        Any padding is marginal, and nothing like the padding the train companies use to try to reduce compensation payments.

        • Paul says:

          Padding is not marginal.
          In 1984/5 the LHR EDI service was a 1hr 10min flight blocks to blocks.
          Today it’s 1hr 25mins but neither London or Edinburgh have moved.
          A 21% increase is not marginal

          • Nancy says:

            Seriously? Comparing 1984 with 2025? 🤦 LHR or EDI didn’t move, but they have grown significantly, so did the traffic (both on ground and in the air)… LHR handled 30mil passengers in 1984, compared to 80mil in 2025. A 165% increase… Similarly with EDI, mostly domestic and basic airport at the time – 1.5mil passengers in 1984, compared to 15.8mil these days. A 950% increase. And you’re really complaining about a 15 minutes increase in block time…. Unbelievable…

          • Tim says:

            This post shows that even if someone reads frequent flyer websites and/or frequently travel on planes, it doesn’t mean they have a clue how airlines and airports operate.

  • RC says:

    One swallow doesn’t make a spring.
    It’s when it’s busier and when summer hits that BA always goes to cr-p.
    So let’s see what April-September looks like before making any conclusions.
    Where is their ‘invisible’ customer experience manager? Still hiding from customers like previous allegations?

  • planeconcorde says:

    I noticed about a year ago, British Airways have been increasing the padding in their flight schedule. For example, JER LHR is only 35 minutes airborne time (runway lift off to runway touchdown without any air traffic holding). The scheduled gate to gate was until last year was 1 hour. But now it varies depending on the time of day. For example on 13-MAR-25 07:00 departure JER to LHR is now 1 hr 15 minutes. Whereas the 13-MAR-25 16:50 departure JER to LHR is 1hr 10 minutes. Flights in the opposite direction are either 1 hr 5 minutes or 1 hr 10 minutes depending on the time of day.
    The problem with the padding the schedule in this way is that there aren’t enough spare gates at T5 to gracefully handle it. When the arrival into LHR is now considered “early” it doesn’t always end well. The assigned gate has a higher chance of being blocked because the aircraft currently on stand wasn’t due to leave yet. This results in either the inbound aircraft having to wait until the stand becomes available or is reassigned to a spare remote stand resulting in bus transfer to the terminal.

    • Tim says:

      Block time for every airline considers taxi out time, taxi in time, and airborne holding time. Heathrow arrival timings are expected *landing* times not on blocks times. BA ask pilots not to land more than 20 mins prior to this time to avoid ground delays and fines from HAL. After that, any issue with gate availability normally comes down to the standard ground delays that every hub has to put up with, for example when 10 pax with checked bags miss their connection but their bags don’t, or a crew change, missing catering or cleaning, or an abundance of any other issues that happen when schedules are tight.

      Realistically, BA aren’t looking to add 5 mins block time to avoid EU compensation or make their punctuality appear better, they’re doing it because statistically flights have needed longer block times at certain points in the day over a period of a year or more.

  • Lee says:

    I fly with lots of different airlines, Heathrow based. It is ONLY ba that has their pilots yapping “dear passengers we have landed early!” to be told that no gate was available or wrong terminal or bags late bla bla bla. and than, to arrive at the gate over half hour LATE!! So they seem happy to reach the tarmac as done a great job on time.

    • Devin says:

      If the pilots are saying that, they’re misleading people. An on time arrival is the time the parking brake is applied, not touchdown.

      If an aircraft touches down particularly early, the chances are that it will have to wait for a stand so announcing an early arrival is likely to anger people more than if they’d say nothing.

      • babyg_wc says:

        doors open/pax can leave is the time used for compensation claims…

        • Devin says:

          Absolutely correct, you’ll find 95% of the time there will be someone waiting to put the jetty or stairs on with a bus waiting.

  • Solitaire says:

    Several months ago, BA pilots were instructed, as policy, to release the parking brake “off chocks” as soon as humanly possible after all cabin/hold doors are closed, regardless if actual push-back was imminent or not. This automatically shows the aircraft as “departed”, very useful to distort on-time departure statistics. That is why we are seeing an incredible improvement in “on-time” departure performance and miraculously so many BA flights departing “early”. Naturally, many frequent flyers were noticing that, whilst sat onboard their flights, ba.com had registered their flight had “departed early” yet they were at the gate for another 20, 30, 40 minutes etc. The BA app no longer displays the actual departure time, just 2 hyphens — , and simply shows the “departed early/late” wording. It is understood that there has been some backlash from customers on flights questioning crew as to why the app states their flight has departed early with a specific time yet they are still languishing at the gate – awaiting the infamous BA “hospitality”.

    • Devin says:

      Pilots were not instructed to release the parking brake “as soon as humanly possible”. It’s done only when the aircraft is ready to depart and receive clearance.

      Despite this, arrival punctuality typically sits a point or two higher than departure punctuality. As an example, today on time departures sit at 93% with arrival punctuality sits at 97%.

    • Nancy says:

      What an absolute salad of nonsense… In your fantasy, were the pilots also instructed to apply the break as soon as they land, so they improve the arrival stats too?

    • John says:

      Who cares when the flight departs as long as you’re on it.

    • Dustymiller says:

      They played the same game in the 90’s. The problem is that the aircraft has to be attached to a tug if you are on a stand that needs pushback. There is not an infinite number of tugs so delays actually got worse!

  • Dezza says:

    Time for BA to follow Ryanair’s lead and play a catchy jingle every time a plane lands on time.

  • Not Long Now... says:

    Boring as it may be to sit on a non-departing plane, realistically surely the only time that matters is when they open the door on arrival. After that it’s the airport’s issue if you take 3 hours to clear immigration.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.