Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Hotels.com Rewards may be coming back, as it attempts to recover market share

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Whilst HfP readers may put the changes at British Airways Club down as the biggest loyalty disaster in recent times (although arguably Virgin Atlantic’s bodged move to dynamic redemption pricing is even worse), the real winner for biggest loyalty screw-up this decade is Expedia Group.

Say what you like about the British Airways and Virgin Atlantic changes, but neither had such a big impact on sales as the launch of One Key.

Dropping Hotels.com Rewards for the anaemic One Key has been a disaster for Expedia Group. The response was so bad that the roll-out has been abandoned. Unfortunately, the US and the UK – which had already switched – are stuck with it.

Hotels.com Rewards is coming back

You didn’t need to be a loyalty guru to realise that – when you are selling a commodity product (someone else’s hotel room) – cutting the kickback to the buyer from 10% to 2% is a disaster waiting to happen. And so it proved.

One Key appears to be going away

Heavy stayers (or, I should say, ex-heavy stayers) at Hotels.com have received a survey this week. There is a £500 raffle prize to encourage people to complete it.

The survey is far, far too complex for people to bother completing it seriously, unfortunately – especially as it seems to have gone to lapsed customers.

The key part, however, is this.

Expedia Group is asking people to choose between two options:

Option 1:

Hotels.com Rewards returns but with a different reward structure

Under Option 1, you would earn HotelsCash. This is basically the same structure as OneKeyCash BUT at a far higher rate. You would start at 6% and go up to 10% if you hit 30 nights per year. You can cash out your accumulated HotelsCash for a room discount at any time.

Hotels.com Rewards is coming back

Option 2:

Hotels.com Rewards returns with the original structure

Under Option 2, the old programme returns. For every 10 nights you book, you receive a free night for the average cost of those 10 nights. You can’t cash out until you have done 10 nights.

It is worth noting that there is no ‘Option 3 – Retain One Key’.

The rest of the survey is just sweating the small stuff:

  • What sort of bonus would you like for hitting elite status?
  • Should Hotels.com match your elite status with the major hotel loyalty schemes?
  • Are you excited by getting gifts of Uber credit, coworking space vouchers, guaranteed upgrade vouchers, free laundry at select hotels, upgrades if available at check-in, airport security fast track vouchers, price drop protection, earning HotelsCash on Starbucks purchases etc?

The bottom line is that One Key appears to be on the way out and Hotels.com Rewards appears to be on the way back.

Whether this is in the form of ‘buy 10, get one free’ as it was originally, or simply a 6% minimum reward (vs 2% today) remains to be seen.

You could give Expedia Group some credit for listening. In truth it didn’t listen before it launched One Key and – as it turned out – didn’t have the slightest understanding of why people (or at least the 20% of people who represented 80% of its bookings) were using Hotels.com in the first place.

Comments (113)

  • Alastair Ross says:

    I disagree with your views on one key. Previously, you could either earn effectively 10% via the free night scheme or get cash back (usually 10%) or use a discount coupon (usually 8%). You could only use ONE.
    Now with one key you get your one key (6% for a Platinum member) AND can get cash back or use a coupon. Recently, they had 14% cash back. I booked several thousand pounds of hotels with 6% one key AND 14% cash back. In addition some had excellent pricing for Platinum members. Such a shame misguided criticism might change things. (By the way, Platinum is pretty easy to get especially if you hire a car as you get 1 point per day as you do with hotels so not difficult to get to 30).

    • Rob says:

      You don’t think the reason they are doing this is a desperate attempt to get numbers back up because of One Key?!

      • meta says:

        You used to be able get 10% cash back previously as well via sites. So this isn’t anything new. You used to be able to get a reward night and 10%, so effectively about 18-20% off. Then they moved to 6% if you collected reward nights. Still 14-16% off. This is all substantially higher than anything available now.

        The only thing that was close was when they ran Amex offer for six months which ended 31 March.

        • Lumma says:

          When you got 10% cashback through the websites the hotel price was often waaaay more expensive than buying on the hotels.com app

          • John says:

            Sometimes, but not always.

            Using discount codes also sometimes raised the price by roughly the amount of the discount – but not always.

            It paid to check all the possibilities.

    • Pip says:

      That’s quite some complexity and if it involves multiple websites and log ins it becomes far less attractive. The simplicity of the old scheme was the appeal to me, to be rewarded for staying at hotels from any chain that best served where I needed to be instead of staying at a dire location where the Hilton or ihg brand was. Scrabbling around on several websites to combine offers for a couple of extra quid isn’t always the best use of the value of time (although with current hotel pricing I’ll accept that a couple of % can now really add up).

      I had the survey and filled it in. I suspect their final free text box question will make for tough reading as they go through the results.

    • Rui N. says:

      You could always get cashback and the nights stamps.

    • r* says:

      you used too get cashback and free nights, then using cashback referrals caused higher prices on the site so codes were often the better option, but then codes often wouldnt work with chain hotels.

      you were probably overpaying if you were using the cashback links.

  • Alex G says:

    The free nights could always be combined with cashback.

  • x2000traveller says:

    I like free lunches as much as anyone but one has to look at the takeaway from the hotels.com saga (at least in the UK): if you offer major discounts, volume is high. If you dramatically cut the discounts, volume drops. Not too surprising.

    Now factor in the hotelier’s perspective (who, recall, is essentially funding the discount through sales commission to Expedia). Is all money really bringing in enough business to support the (eg) 10-15% cost? Wouldn’t it be better if I could have targetted promotions through Expedia when trade is lower but move to much lower commissions at busy times when I am going to sell all my rooms anyway? Or to offer higher discounts to those who really are my (not just Expedia’s) best clients?

    If Expedia can’t offer me something like that, perhaps I need to switch my inventory somewhere else! Or join one of the major chains (Marriott etc.)

    So hotels.com Rewards needed to change. Expedia could have done it more artfully but just bringing it back is probably not going to cut the mustard!

    • Rob says:

      The hotel pays Expedia 20-25% flat and has to agree to rate parity so it can’t sell publicly for less direct.

      Rate parity creates different dynamics. Its a commodity product so the defining factor is rebate. It’s not service etc, unlike in the real world, because none is provided. There are no switching costs. Even swapping your gas provider is far harder work than swapping which website you visit to book a hotel room. A swish app, good search facility etc may buy you a little margin flexibility but not much.

      I’d love to see how much Avios Hotels has picked up from all this, given they offer 20 Avios per £1 at times. And that is powered by, erm, Expedia.

      • Bagoly says:

        Rate Parity is now illegal in most of Europe.
        That creates a different environment for hotels there.

        Althought I’m mystified by one hotel we have used a couple of times which charge 60% MORE on their own wesbite than on booking.com (where they suffer c20% commission)

        • kevin86 says:

          Many of the hotels I’ve booked recently had a discount code on their own website and a “member’s rate” so whilst in theory there was rate parity, it was much cheaper to book direct

          • Rob says:

            Yes, Member Rates get around rate parity rules.

          • meta says:

            It will depend on individual contracts. I’ve seen independent hotels in Japan who have better rates on their website than Expedia.

  • Tracey says:

    Having been a loyal hotels.com player, who lost out when previous bookings were moved from the old scheme to keys, I did say never again. Since then have been using BAH whenever possible, but that too has lost its silver lining. So it could be time for a revisit.

  • Erico1875 says:

    I’ve never found Hotels.com competitive even with TCB or rebates etc.
    Any hotel I’ve looked at could always be undercut via Trivago or google

    Although our holiday rental is on Expedia/hotels.com, all our bookings come via 80% booking.com 20% Airbnb

    • jj says:

      The old scheme of eleven nights for the price of ten gave 9.1% benefit, not 10%.

      Either way, I haven’t used hotels.com since the switch to OneKey, except to draw-down my balance. I used to spend several £’000 with them most years. It doesn’t take many people like me to cause a huge P&L problem.

      • Rob says:

        There were plenty of HfP readers doing 50-100 nights per year through them. Lots of little positive quirks eg you could book for anyone. Need a hotel for my parents in law? No bother. Credits go to you. Need 4 rooms? No problem, you get 4 nights credit (few chains allow that).

        • Rui N. says:

          Indeed, most of my stamps came from booking hotels for other people, mostly my parents and the in-laws.

          • Rob says:

            I bet they don’t even know what % of bookings were for someone else other than the person who got the credit, even though you supplied the guest name.

        • Bagoly says:

          So that’s another market too – serving Friends&Family informal Travel Agents!

          • meta says:

            Not just Friends&Family, you could book for anyone. I had a whole operation at one point. It was event planners dream.

            @John it will also depend on the level you had in hotels.com Silvers and Golds got shown better pricing than just members.

    • John says:

      That’s odd, trivago was always more expensive when I could be bothered to check. The only way we can both be correct is if we stay in different kinds of hotels where this difference is reflected in their pricing to trivago and hotels.com??

      • Tim S says:

        I had the same experience. Trivago didn’t even offer up the mid priced hotels I looked at.

        It might have given me good rates for super luxury hotels far above my price range, but for my price range it was useless.

        That was a few years ago, could be different now.

  • sigma421 says:

    Another factor was that cashback rewards are just generally less exciting than a free thing. Look at Nectar. Is anyone genuinely excited by the prospect of £2.50 off at Sainsbury’s every so often? A free hotel night on the other hand feels like a treat.

    • Rob says:

      Indeed. There is a view in the industry that GenZ have the attention span of a knat and won’t take part in any loyalty scheme that does not allow instant rewards. The idea of doing 10 nights to be rewarded is meant to bring them out in a cold sweat.

      This may well be true. However, chasing this market has a lot of issues. They don’t have much money to spend. They don’t actually book many hotel nights. They don’t know your brand so the marketing costs are high. More importantly, a lot are just packaging hotels with flights via Expedia anyway.

      Expedia Group already has a low reward hotel platform called Expedia. What was smart about Hotels.com is that it was a separate platform which attracted high, regular spenders. Leave the ‘I book one hotel night per year’ market to Expedia or even Booking.com.

      Bottom line – the average member of a UK frequent flyer scheme (and indeed HfP reader) is mid 40s. The number of people of this age group working in advertising / marketing / PR in the UK is probably about 5. One Key is the equivalent of what you get if you ask my kids to design a marketing campaign for stairlifts.

      • Robin says:

        Is a knat related to Monty Python’s “kniggit”?!

      • Ladyshopper says:

        My kids are Gen Z, and their go to when looking for somewhere to stay in airbnb. Whereas that’s probably my last place to look (although saying that, we did use it recently in Rome and got a great place to stay).

      • jj says:

        “One Key is the equivalent of what you get if you ask my kids to design a marketing campaign for stairlifts.”

        My favourite comment of the day.

      • Chrisasaurus says:

        Fun fact – many years ago a Microsoft Research study found that human attention spans had trended down from 12 seconds to 8 seconds on average. Believe to be driven by the influx of digital distractions and feeds.

        By comparison a goldfish is believed to have a span of 9 seconds.

        Just leave that with you all.

  • Eric says:

    I knew a few people who had zero interest in loyalty schemes and points – too confusing, expiring points, hard to extract value, not enough travel with single providers etc – but loved Hotels.com because it was really obvious what they were getting and easy to trigger a voucher. It’s easy on here to think about everything through an expert lens where people know the layering of Amex offers, comparisons to Bonvoy and use of specialist credit cards etc but I reckon a big chunk of this was just alienating everyday users who saw it as taking away free nights and giving back some seemingly worthless points.

  • Alex says:

    The biggest irony is a couple of years back they trashed the previously great app in order to facilitate One Key, as all the Expedia brands needed to be on the same IT system. Even before OK was launched they were hurting their business for it

Leave a Reply to Dubious Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.