Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Questions about Virgin Atlantic and British Airways as the Bank of England publishes its bailout list

Links on Head for Points may pay us an affiliate commission. A list of partners is here.

The Bank of England has published the list of businesses which have received a taxpayer-funded bailout under the UK Government’s Coronavirus Corporate Finance Facility (CCFF).

You can download it as an Excel spreadsheet here.

This is the list of companies who have applied for AND DRAWN funding from CCFF.  It does not include, for example, Jet2 which we know has applied and been accepted but has not yet asked for the money to be paid.

easyJet, Ireland’s Ryanair and, erm, Hungary’s Wizz Air are on the list as you can see, as is British Airways.

(Before we go on, I accept that not everyone defines taking CCFF money as a ‘bailout’.  That’s up to you.  It depends if you see lending up to £1 billion of taxpayers money to struggling companies, with no security, for as little as 0.2% interest as a ‘bailout’ or not.)

The reason I am looking at this is because of the inconsistencies in the Virgin Atlantic and British Airways positions.

Let’s look at Virgin Atlantic first.

Virgin Atlantic is unable to access the CCFF for technical reasons.  There are rules about how your existing debt should be structured and Virgin Atlantic does not meet those requirements.  This is despite the fact that the company is hampered by Government restrictions – most recently the new quarantine requirements – which stop it trading as it would like.

You may or may not feel that Virgin Atlantic should receive a virtually interest free loan from the UK Government.  However, let’s look at some of the companies which HAVE been given your money via the CCFF – is Virgin Atlantic any less deserving than any of these?

BASF – German chemicals group employing just 800 people in the UK – £1 billion, which is being used to part-fund a €3 billion dividend payment to shareholders on 23rd June

Bayer – German pharmaceutical group – £600 million, which was used to part-fund a €2.6 billion dividend payment to shareholders on 4th May

Chanel – French maker of luxury goods – £600 million

CNH Industrial – an Italian / Dutch / US maker of agricultural machinery which is UK-domiciled for tax only – £600 million

Tottenham Hotspur – £175 million

Take a look at the full list which also includes Burberry and shopping centre owner Westfield.  It’s hard not to feel sorry for Virgin Atlantic, its employees and its suppliers when you see so much taxpayer money being handed out to companies with few (in some case virtually no) UK employees or activities.

The British Airways position is confusing too ……

There is something odd, on the face of it, about the way that British Airways is included on this list.

On 7th May, when BA’s parent IAG published its 1st Quarter results, it was announced that it had taken £300 million from the Coronavirus Corporate Finance Facility.

It was vague about which group entity had taken this money.  We assumed that it was IAG at the parent company level.  British Airways has been constantly pushing the fact that it is refusing to take Government money and so must force through its redundancy programme, including cuts in pay and conditions for those staff who remain.

Even the Bank of England is being vague about who actually took the money.  The spreadsheet released shows that £300 million was taken by:

“British Airways PLC (International Airways Group PLC)”

This is as clear as mud.  Was it BA that took the £300m?  Or was it International Airways Group PLC?

International Airways Group PLC doesn’t even exist.  The immediate and ultimate parent company of British Airways plc is International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A, which is incorporated in Spain.  On the balance of probability, it does seem that it was British Airways plc that took the £300 million.

(Want to earn more Avios?  Click here to visit our home page for the latest articles on earning and spending your Avios points and click here to see how to earn more Avios from current offers and promotions.)

Comments (92)

  • David the 1st says:

    Bit harsh to imply CNH is a tax domiciled company only. They are the UK’s largest manufacturer of tractors, and a major employer and exporter.

  • gmseed says:

    You state that the money is loaned at 0.2%. I’d be interested in a source to confirm that fact.

    I see the BoE has loaned £16billion so far. Now we know it doesn’t just have that amount of cash sitting in the bank, and so must borrow the money from elsewhere. Thus, I’m curious if the BoE is paying out a higher rate of interest that it gets back at 0.2% It wouldn’t surprise me in MugUK.

    • Rob says:

      It is 0.2%, 0.4% or 0.6% based on your credit quality.

    • Mr(s) Entitled says:

      Thank Bank of England’s reserves are far far far greater than £16bn. The bank rate is now 0.1% p.a. so they should be making on the loans. The Govt (100% owner of BoE) can borrow 5yr money at 0.086% in the open market. I think these are a max of 6yr loans, hence picking the 5yr yield. Either way, MugUK is doing just fine in at the moment. Defaults may change the math however.

  • Pete says:

    I reckon the Government is determined to not allow Virgin to get money due to Sir Richard having runs in with the Government in the past. He sued the NHS (who aren’t a sacred cow – If they were wrong then they were wrong), I’m sure he also declined to take failed asylum seekers back on Virgin branded planes, he’s had loads of public spats about the trainline contract allocation set up. There’s other examples too I’m sure. So I believe that the Government just simply don’t like him, and there will forever be technicalities against his brand.

  • Sanjay says:

    Tottenham Hotspur exploiting government schemes again. This one will get through without criticism. No doubt Levy will use the funds to invest in ENIC and make a killing at the expense of the taxpayer. This winds me up even more than the airlines tbh.