Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

We try out Qatar Airways’ new Starlink wifi – a genuine game-changer

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Last year, I wrote that 2025 would be the year of unlimited, fast and free inflight wifi. Qatar Airways is at the forefront of this charge, at least when it comes to long haul services, thanks to its progress installing Starlink wifi.

Starlink is a network of over 7,000 satellites in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) that supplies satellite internet services around the world. Whilst it initially launched as a terrestial home internet system, it is now available for aircraft installation.

Satellite wifi for aircraft is nothing new – the first such system went live in the year 2000 – but Starlink and other Low Earth Orbit systems (like OneWeb and Amazon’s planned Project Kuiper) offer higher speeds, more bandwidth and lower latency. In short, it is faster and more reliable.

Using Starlink wifi on Qatar Airways

Qatar Airways is one of the first airlines to install Starlink connectivity, although United Airlines and Air France have also announced plans to do so.

So, does it live up to the hype? Rob and I travelled to Doha last week for meetings with Qatar Airways (flights were provided) and we deliberately chose Boeing 777-300 day flights in both directions so we could give it 12 hours of testing.

What is it like using Qatar Airways’ new Starlink wifi?

I am not exaggerating when I call the new Starlink service a genuine gamechanger. For the first time, it makes browsing the internet as easy at 35,000 feet as it is on the ground.

For premium passengers, it is perhaps the biggest gamechanger since flat beds in business class. For economy passengers, it is the biggest change since individual IFE screens were introduced.

Once you have flown a long haul aircraft with Starlink, you will not (if given a choice) book anything else.

Did I mention it’s free too? Starlink insists that airlines cannot charge for it. It is SO good that airlines are voluntarily ripping out their expensive existing systems, and giving up the revenue they generate, to give customers free Starlink wifi. Well, forward thinking airlines anyway ….

Connecting is a doddle, with no annoying pop-ups or interstitial pages. You do not need to sign in with your Privilege Club account or enter a password. All you do is connect to the ‘Oryx Comms’ network and you are instantly online. It is incredibly frictionless.

It’s also ‘gate to gate’. You can connect the second you board and you can keep going until the aircraft parks up. Literally not a second is wasted.

Once online you can browse as if you were at home, and I genuinely mean that.

Actually, I don’t mean that. Unless you are spending a fortune for your home wifi, Starlink is better.

Qatar Airways advertises it as being ‘up to 500 megabits per second’. I managed to get 200 mbps exactly on our outbound flight:

Qatar Airways Starlink wifi

200 mpbs is faster than our WeWork office which in theory is specifically wired to serve tech-driven companies. It was fast enough to deal with anything I threw at it, including a YouTube stream and other high-bandwidth applications.

Both Rob and I spent the entire flight working on our laptops as if we were in the office. We even skipped our second meals because we were getting so much done!

For the first time ever, there was no noticeable difference in connectivity between being at home in London versus flying at 35,000 feet and we could accomplish anything we needed.

Bar a couple of glasses of champagne as we worked we were genuinely as productive as we would have been in the office – perhaps more so, given the lack of other distractions.

Even more convenient was the fact that connecting required no convoluted process. You just connected to the network and that was that – no faffing with seat numbers, surnames or logins.

The service is so good that it is all the more unfortunate that some countries do not allow satellite internet in their territories. Unfortunately, this is out of Qatar Airways’ control – it is dependent on each country’s regulator to permit or deny the service, and some countries (such as India) are particularly aggressive in blocking satellite internet.

Fortunately, we were able to stay connected for the entire duration of our London – Doha – London flights.

There was no disruption from other passengers using the service either to stream content without headphones or making phone or video calls, although the Boeing 777 is a fairly noisy aircraft. In fact, everyone was remarkably well behaved!

Qatar AIrways Starlink wifi

Which aircraft currently have Starlink wifi?

I can only describe the rollout as ‘record pace’ given the first installation was complete in late October 2024. I doubt any other airline will be able to match the speed of Qatar Airways’ roll-out.

The good news is that the Boeing 777-300ER fleet is now virtually complete with the 777-200LR and A350s next.

When both fleets are complete the vast majority of Qatar’s long haul services will feature fast and unlimited free wifi. So far, Qatar Airways has committed to installing Starlink on its Boeing 777, 787 and A350 fleets. Here is the progress so far:

  • Boeing 777-300ER: 45 aircraft complete
  • Boeing 777-200LR: 1 aircraft currently in testing
  • A350-900: 1 aircraft currently in testing (the first A350 globally to have Starlink)

The full Boeing 777 fleet is due to be complete by Q2 or Q3 this year, whilst the A350 fleet will be completed by Q2 2026. The Boeing 787-8 fleet should be done by the end of 2026 followed by the Boeing 787-9 fleet.

Because the A350 and 777-200LR installation programme has only just begun, you will need to book a Boeing 777-300ER service if you want to be 100% certain of Starlink.

Qatar Airways has yet to announce whether it will install Starlink on its eight A380 aircraft and I suspect it will depend on the long-term fate of these planes. Whilst they were due to be retired during covid, delays on the Boeing 777X program (of which Qatar Airways has almost 100 on order) meant they were pressed back into service.

How does Qatar Airways’ Starlink wifi work?

In addition to experiencing the new wifi service on board both our flights, we had a tour of the hangar at Hamad International Airport where Qatar Airways is installing the Starlink antenna. Sadly no photos were allowed so you’ll have to use your imagination!

There are other benefits to installing Starlink beyond customer satisfaction. The dual-antenna system weighs just 10kg, less than one sixth the weight of the previous wifi system which came in at a hefty 65kg.

Why is Starlink so much lighter? Part of it is because it uses two so-called ‘phased array’ antennas.

Most current inflight wifi systems use what are called ‘Electronically Steered Antennas’. These are large, heavy antennas that physically move within the small bump on the roof of the aircraft. As the aircraft flies it must maintain a line-of-sight connection with the satellite, and it does so with 180-degrees of movement thanks to its electric motors.

Phased array antennas work in an entirely different way. Crucially, they remove the need for heavy moving parts. A phased array antenna is made up of many mini-antennas which can be individually controlled to steer a beam of radio waves in the direction required.

For Starlink, this means refocusing on a new satellite every minute or two as one of 7,000 satellites orbit the earth at a speed of around 7.7km per second, or one orbit every 90 minutes.

I’m told that Starlink has made the installation of the new system incredibly simple, and far quicker than previous systems. The kit for each aircraft literally turns up in a crate, ready to go. Whilst the aircraft we visited were having longer engineering checks done at the same time, it can take as little as two days to install and fully test the system.

Starlink provides the full kit, from the antenna that is mounted on the top of the rear fuselage to the six cabin routers. Each system has double the capacity required: there are two antennas, two power supplies and six routers. If one antenna goes out of service, the other antenna (and routers) should be able to maintain a stable connection, albeit at a lower overall bandwidth.

Conclusion

Both Rob and I agreed that Qatar Airways’ new Starlink service was a leap forward in onboard wifi, and indeed in the overall aircraft experience.

Previous systems have been slow, expensive and difficult to use. Starlink is the opposite: it’s free, fast, gate to gate and simple to connect to.

The biggest takeaway is that we are leaving the era of differentiated wifi services onboard and on the ground. With Starlink, airlines will be able to offer the same (better, actually) wifi speeds you would expect at home, in the office or anywhere else on the planet.

It may even change booking patterns. Your boss may have considered a day flight a waste if you lost a day of work, but with Starlink you can be as productive as you are in the office (we proved that!).

The downside, of course, is that there is no longer an excuse for being offline, either from your employer or your family!

Unless other airlines catch-up – and, in time, they will have no choice – Qatar Airways now has a huge competitive advantage.

You can find out more about Qatar Airways’ Starlink service on its website here.

Comments (215)

  • VM Whit says:

    I used Starlink last week Doha / Delhi and back.
    It is a game-changer fully agree with HFP. So much so that I want it for home. (Elon’s redemption but won’t be getting a Tesla).
    In fact I got so much work done I bi-passed all sleep – was shattered – possibly a bad thing.

  • Davey11 says:

    Silicon Valley companies providing a free service means that the customer (be it Qatar, Passengers or both) are going to end up paying down the line.

    • SteveJ says:

      It’s not free to Qatar, they are paying Starlink. But Starlink mandate that Qatar can’t charge on to the end customer.

      • Davey11 says:

        Indeed, and why is that? Pure kindness and generosity on behalf of Starlink?

        • Rob says:

          Have you never worked for a company which had a product so great that you could effectively force your customers to agree to anything?

          You are also aware, for eg, that Facebook has spent huge sums in the past funding internet infrastructure in the global south for which it doesn’t charge? For these guys it’s all about eyeballs.

          • Davey11 says:

            The question remains why.

            Facebook (and Google etc) have indeed done loads to get the internet to more people. As their models are indeed based on eyeballs and ads. To my knowledge Starlinks isn’t.

          • Rob says:

            I don’t know what is so difficult here.

            Qatar pays Starlink.

            Starlink does not let Qatar charge you (because they want to have people using it, and it has the market power to do this).

            Qatar is happy to do this because it knows Starlink will sell more tickets.

            Not difficult.

            Or let’s try Plan B (which is a guess):

            *Starlink sells the kit at cost, perhaps even for free (because airlines are wary of ripping out the expensive kit they only paid for relatively recently)

            *The fee Qatar pays is based on data volumes consumed

            *Forcing airlines to give it away means that data volumes will be high

      • FFoxSake says:

        Not allowed to directly charge the end customer, but won’t stop them marginally increasing all fares to cover the extra costs.

        • Rob says:

          It’s a big money maker long term. IFE will be removed at some point I’m sure and the weight / cost of that is shocking.

          At best you will have a screen which does little except take a feed from your phone which is downloading content from Starlink.

          Note also that, for eg, QR saved the cost of 4 meals because both of us rejected the 2nd light meal both ways …..

          • LittleNick says:

            How is QR saving the cost of those meals if they’ve been loaded onto the plane? Don’t they just go to waste if no other customer has them?

          • Rob says:

            Obviously that is (short term) true. Medium term they will adjust loadings if the average take-up of 2nd meals on Starlink flights changes. Indeed, perhaps they already have? Perhaps they knew before we did that we wouldn’t want one?

          • Novice says:

            Rob, but how is this great for passengers who don’t need to work? If as a leisure traveller, I definitely want my meals but due to wifi, qr is assuming that I won’t eat then how is that good? Does this mean the quality of service and food will deteriorate over time as everyone will just have eyeballs glued to their devices? I can only see a benefit for daytime flights for ppl who want to work while flying. There’s no benefit of having constant wifi otherwise. Mental illnesses seem to have ballooned since the tech bros wanted our eyeballs constantly…

            And, Rhys questioning that if we think business ppl are vampires? Sure as hell seems like it sometimes. Tourist places already have a problem due to wifi as everyone seems to be online as they are there for the posts/clicks/likes instead of actually experiencing anything and they spoil it for others who are there for the attractions and now free wifi to the entire plane will definitely spoil the whole experience for offline passengers.

            Imagine saving up for months/yrs for a business class flight to a once in a lifetime holiday trip (like some low paid ppl do) and then reading reviews before traveling and you get onboard and as soon as you sit, most of your neighbours get their laptops/phones/devices out and get online to do work and the crew doesn’t bother to come round because by then they know everyone’s eyeballs are glued so no need for niceties or drinks or whatever.

          • Rob says:

            That’s already the case though. Take an overnight flight in Business from New York and the majority of the cabin (the business traveller bit) will ignore all food and all drink to go straight to sleep, and anyone who wants a bit of an ‘experience’ will find that BA has only loaded the dregs from the caterers for the handful who dare to disturb the crew’s chatter.

          • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

            “ … BA has only loaded the dregs from the caterers …”

            You do write some nonsense at times.

            Flew back from JFK beginning of March and dinner was just as good as the outbound day time flight.

            And the crew weren’t chattering either.

          • Cicero says:

            I’m baffled as to why aircraft still have IFE now that everyone travels with an iPad or laptop (unless they choose not to.) It seems a complete waste.

          • Cicero says:

            @Novice – When you say “imagine saving up for months or even years for a business class trip”, and then finding that people are working on, err, business, should people really be surprised?

  • Andy says:

    Rob/Rhys, did either of you connect via a VPN? Was this possible, and if so, did it noticeably affect the connection speed or prevent access to any websites? (My employer requires Wi-Fi connection via a VPN) Thanks.

    • Rhys says:

      I had it on my phone but not laptop. Didn’t test it for blocking sites. I did notice on my laptop (no VPN) that it blocked the Youtube comments section because it was forcibly serving Youtube in restricted mode.

  • Albert says:

    I recognise that this site is focused on showcasing innovative services and travel tips to to frequent travellers, but the article reads all too much like a plug for the airline and Internet company. It would have been nice for it to be more journalistic with some additional critique. There has been some effort at this but only in the brief penultimate paragraph. It was good to read nonetheless.

    • Rhys says:

      What critique, exactly, would you expect? It was free, fast and easy to connect. It is better than existing sat wifi solutions on planes currently. Purely from a technological standpoint it is a step forward in every possible way.

    • Cicero says:

      HfP is more than happy to put the boot in where it is deserved – see its recent coverage of BA’s halfwitted EC changes – so I think a very positive article should be taken as a genuine endorsement. It sounds brilliant when compared to existing airline WiFi.

  • Rts says:

    Dang, no sterling on the 787s ? I’m flying to MEL in a 787 and then a 777er

  • Aliks says:

    Long haul flights can be pretty boring when you have 10 hours to fill and nothing on the in flight entertainment appeals.

    Last week we flew back from Melbourne to London via Doha with constant Qatar wifi and it was great, game changing and all that!!
    I’m retired so I don’t need the internet for work any more, but having good, reliable internet access gives you a lot more choice of entertainment, browsing, book reading, learning etc.

    Planes are noisy places already, and I really dont mind a background hubbub of conversation from other travellers – you get that in restaurants and bars and it doesnt spoil anything.

    • Andy says:

      Let’s hope the trend for speakerphone conversations (“listen to ME everyone!!”) doesn’t make its way to the cabin, or it may lead to the live-streaming of in-flight brawls. And the first ‘live’ YouTube flight review must be imminent. Oh God.

    • Jon says:

      “I really dont mind a background hubbub of conversation from other travellers”

      If it’s just quiet in-person conversation, I wouldn’t necessarily disagree – maybe depending on time of night and how long it goes on for etc ;-). Trouble with speakerphones is there’s something about electronically-amplified speech that makes it far far more intrusive and annoying… And don’t get me started on keyboard clicks 😂

    • John says:

      Well yeah it’s nice to not have to remember / bother, but it’s not exactly difficult to preload sufficient entertainment before your flight.

      I mean I currently have about 10 books on my phone that I never get around to reading normally, but when I am on a flight and have no internet access, I resume from where I left off on my previous flight….

    • John33 says:

      Is this a serious comment? Are you seriously comparing the screechy high-pitched noise coming out of a phone to restaurant chatter? Have people lost their minds, do they not understand what it means to be human anymore? What dystopia do we live in??

  • paul says:

    Does anyone know what starlink charge qatar? Would love to know.

    • Rhys says:

      Only Starlink and Qatar will know that.

    • JR says:

      Starlink Boat is $350-500 setup fee and $50-150/month depending on how much data is consumed. Easily absorbable for a company like Qatar….

  • Chris W says:

    So what are the list of countries that block coverage? That would have been useful to include.

    India, China, others?

Leave a Reply to paul Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.