Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

British Airways tries to fix its Heathrow problems by increasing Minimum Connection Times

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

From January, British Airways will increase its minimum connection times at Heathrow by 25%.

Minimum Connection Times (often referred to as MCTs) govern the shortest time available for bookable flight connections. These are set by airlines and airports to ensure you have the best chances of making it from one flight to the next and to prevent you from booking flights where you (and your baggage!) would not have enough time to transfer to the next flight.

Minimum connection times can vary by airport and airline, with ticketing websites taking into account any MCTs as part of your itinerary.

British Airways increasing Minimum Connecting Time at Heathrow

The MCT is calculated as the period between the scheduled arrival of your first flight and the scheduled departure of your second.

At most airports, it is between 30 and 90 minutes, depending on whether you are connecting to a domestic or international flight, as well as the size of the terminal. At Munich, for example, German effiiciency means that they can offer a Minimum Connection Time of 30 minutes.

British Airways increases Minimum Connection Time to 75 minutes

At present, British Airways operates an MCT of 60 minutes for connections at its hub in London Heathrow. This increases to 90 minutes if you need to change terminal.

This is changing in early January. British Airways has already started emailing passengers whose flights no longer meet the MCT guidelines:

“From 9th January 2024 we are changing our connection times at London Heathrow. Due to this change, your upcoming British Airways connection at London Heathrow will no longer be possible. We are in the process of reviewing your booking to ensure you can make your connection and if required we will look to rebook your connection/s free of charge on your behalf.”

The change is likely due to an increasing number of passengers failing to make their connections due to delays at security, immigration or simply delayed arriving aircraft

The change only applies to passengers connecting from:

  • a long haul flight to another long haul, short haul or domestic flight
  • a domestic flight to a short haul or long haul flight

Minimum Connection Times from one domestic flight to another remain unchanged at 60 minutes. Inter-terminal MCTs remain at 90 minutes.

British Airways Minimum Connection Time Heathrow

How this affects existing bookings

As noted in BA’s email, it is currently reviewing existing bookings to ensure that you have enough time to make it to your second flight.

British Airways has confirmed to us that anyone with a minimum connection of less than 75 minutes from the 9th January will be rebooked onto another flight. This will be free of charge.

BA was unable to tell us how many passengers would be affected, although it is likely to be a relatively small figure as most people prefer to book flights with slightly longer connection times when they can.

What about new bookings?

Any flights now bookable will take into account the new minimum connection times and you will only be offered flights at Heathrow with at least 75 minutes between arrival and departure.

You won’t be able to book a flight with an MCT of less than 75 minutes, even if there is an earlier flight departing.

In the medium term it is likely that timetable adjustments will be required to ensure that the most popular connecting routes are not forcing passengers into multi-hour waits – something that is likely to ensure they book elsewhere.

This won’t be straightforward, given that British Airways does not operate a ‘bank’ structure like Emirates or Qatar Airways with long haul arrivals landing (and later departing) back to back in short bursts.

Conclusion

British Airways clearly feels that more customers than it would like are missing their connections and – with the underlying problems seemingly unfixable – is increasing Minimum Connection Times in order to reduce misconnects.

It does mean that British Airways now has one of the longest minimum connection times at its hub at Heathrow versus its competitors. Paris Charles de Gaulle has a 60 minute connection time, whilst at Schiphol it is 50 minutes. Things are even better in Zurich (40 minutes) and Munich (30 minutes).

A 75-minute same-terminal minimum connection time suggests that Heathrow and British Airways are still struggling to ramp up services in the post-pandemic environment. At least passengers in the future should have a better chance of making their flight.

If your booking has been affected you may wish to join the discussion on our forums.


How to earn Avios from UK credit cards

How to earn Avios from UK credit cards (October 2024)

As a reminder, there are various ways of earning Avios points from UK credit cards.  Many cards also have generous sign-up bonuses!

In February 2022, Barclaycard launched two exciting new Barclaycard Avios Mastercard cards with a bonus of up to 25,000 Avios. You can apply here.

You qualify for the bonus on these cards even if you have a British Airways American Express card:

Barclaycard Avios Plus card

Barclaycard Avios Plus Mastercard

Get 25,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £10,000 Read our full review

Barclaycard Avios card

Barclaycard Avios Mastercard

Get 5,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £20,000 Read our full review

There are two official British Airways American Express cards with attractive sign-up bonuses:

British Airways American Express Premium Plus

30,000 Avios and the famous annual 2-4-1 voucher Read our full review

British Airways American Express

5,000 Avios for signing up and an Economy 2-4-1 voucher for spending £15,000 Read our full review

You can also get generous sign-up bonuses by applying for American Express cards which earn Membership Rewards points. These points convert at 1:1 into Avios.

American Express Preferred Rewards Gold

Your best beginner’s card – 20,000 points, FREE for a year & four airport lounge passes Read our full review

The Platinum Card from American Express

50,000 bonus points and great travel benefits – for a large fee Read our full review

Run your own business?

We recommend Capital on Tap for limited companies. You earn 1 Avios per £1 which is impressive for a Visa card, along with a sign-up bonus worth 10,500 Avios.

Capital on Tap Business Rewards Visa

10,000 points bonus – plus an extra 500 points for our readers Read our full review

There is also a British Airways American Express card for small businesses:

British Airways American Express Accelerating Business

30,000 Avios sign-up bonus – plus annual bonuses of up to 30,000 Avios Read our full review

There are also generous bonuses on the two American Express Business cards, with the points converting at 1:1 into Avios. These cards are open to sole traders as well as limited companies.

American Express Business Platinum

Up to 80,000 points when you sign-up and an annual £200 Amex Travel credit Read our full review

American Express Business Gold

Get up to 40,000 points as a sign-up offer and FREE for a year Read our full review

Click here to read our detailed summary of all UK credit cards which earn Avios. This includes both personal and small business cards.

Comments (154)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Matthias says:

    Living in London I don’t care about MCTs at LHR.

    Howecer I do care about BA punctuality – including any wait to open the door! – and recently that’s been appalling.

    I really don’t know why it’s so hard but would love for BA to finally sort it out.

    Oh and perhaps stop deploying emergency slides unnecessarily.- I think I’ve counted 3 in the past couple of months now. (Nothing to do with MCT or punctuality, but it doesn’t shout ‘well run airline’).

    • Rhys says:

      easyJet not much better. Both my last flights were either cancelled or delayed.

      • Richie says:

        BTW Lady London’s comments in the forums on easyJet’s delays are quite interesting.

        • SamG says:

          Yep. Have a gander at the Gatwick page of flightradar24 of an evening , Easyjet are often very delayed and cancelling most evenings recently

  • Richard Peters says:

    T5 is great if you know where you are going but smooth passage often frustrated by visitors not used to it and often in no hurray as on vacation! A very stressful 60 minutes from C gate to 6A not helped by my own incompetence going through wrong PP control and then back through security but as always the NCL flight a shambles and left 50 minutes late so had more than enough time.

    • Harry T says:

      Has the NCL flight ever been on time in the last three or so years?

      • Richard Peters says:

        Not to my knowledge either NCL/LHR or vice versa such that OH insists on dead time at LHR!

    • Rhys says:

      What do you mean? Heathrow has some of the best signage of any airport, anywhere! Purple for connections, yellow for gates etc.

      • Rob says:

        Yes. I had a nightmare in Seville yesterday (not exactly the world’s biggest airport) trying to find the lounge, because there is literally not a single sign pointing to it. You come out of the duty free maze, there are various ways to go, loads of gate signage and nothing for the lounge. I set off in what I thought may be correct but gave up after a minute because I passed many signs for many things, none of which covered the lounge. Various sets of stairs and lifts go down but its not clear if you should be taking any of them. Went back to the central area, got guidance, was told I was going the right way, set off again. Total palava.

        • Andrew says:

          Finding the lounge in Dublin T1 the other day after security was a bit of a pantomime with poor signage (it’s behind you!)

      • Richard Peters says:

        I know and been through enough times to know better but I was rushing and not concentrating!

  • Alex Sm says:

    Tbh, it sounds like a move in the right direction. These 30-40-minute connections at European airports are always a 50/50 gamble, especially for non-Schengen passengers. Esp Vienna and Warsaw… and even if you make it, your bag probably won’t. Two weeks ago my bag was left behind at FRA despite 90 mins connection and RUSH tag on the bag…

    • Bagoly says:

      I guess the issue is the same as with resort fees – providers compete to appear at the top of lists presented to buyers.
      If Google Flights introduced a weighting to reflect proportion of connections missed, it might lead to greater honesty and effectiveness all-round.

      Regulation to get that data published would be useful.

      • NFH says:

        No, resort fees facilitate a misleading indication of price, which would be akin to budget airlines’ charges for taking standard-sized cabin baggage on board – an unavoidable cost for most passengers. Unrealistically-short connection times are not a misleading indication of price.

      • Aston100 says:

        “If Google Flights introduced a weighting to reflect proportion of connections missed, it might lead to greater honesty and effectiveness all-round.”
        I think most people (especially families) would still go for the cheapest option.

        • Rhys says:

          …and the shortest. I don’t want to hang around in an airport longer than I need to. I’d probably take the risk of a 60 min connection over a 5 hour one, for example.

    • Phillip says:

      I’ve often landed in Vienna to the usual parking by a gate but having to wait for buses that take a long time to arrive then very long queues through passport control. I’ve even boarded the aircraft to find that the crew had already given the go ahead to someone else to take my seat, clearly not expecting me to make it!

  • Gareth Oakley says:

    The 60 minute MCT at CDG is a joke – try getting the transit bus around T2 and you’ll find that it’s unachievable. You can easily spend 50 mins just on that.

    • Fraser says:

      It’s more of a joke that Air France continues to offer ticketed 45 minute connection times!

      I declined this offer recently from RAK-CDG-EDI and opted instead for 2x 2-3 hour connections routing RAK-CDG-AMS-EDI. I made the flights without a problem and enjoyed the lounged thanks to ITA status match which confused the lounge staff no end.

      However, that didn’t explain why AF sent my luggage to Dallas Fort Worth for a 3 day detour!!

  • SammyJ says:

    Out of interest, what is the MCT on a LHR/LGW connection? I see people regularly being offered flights from OTAs with 3hrs or less!

    • Qrfan says:

      3.5 hours but t’s not protected as far as I know so if you miss it you’re on your own. Are the OTAs selling separate tickets?

      • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

        On a single ticket BA will protect you.

        • SammyJ says:

          There’s always a caveat about it being your responsibility, I’m not entirely sure what protection BA offer. The OTAs are a law unto themselves these days, but even 3.5hrs booked direct with BA sounds a bit tight to me – we’ve waited over an hour for luggage recently, let alone then waiting for transport and playing M25 roulette. Not one I’d go for personally!

  • Alan says:

    Yet another negative change for customers not based in London. Domestic to international intra-T5 shouldn’t need increased as no security or passport issues so disappointing they’re doing it in both directions. Of course the other problem is the general reduction in domestic feeder flights they now have (not to mention LGW which is now virtually impossible from most other UK airports). It really makes travelling long haul with BA pretty unappealing when you’re stuck for ages waiting between flights, T5 is a pretty unappealing terminal as it is!

    • Peter K says:

      And yet people will happily accept a 3-8hrs wait between flights at Doha and not complain about Qatar airways.

      • John says:

        Maybe because doha feels and is further away. Transiting Zurich feels much closer and the flight lands in Switzerland at the same time a direct would land at Heathrow except its another 3 hours to get to Heathrow

    • Harry T says:

      It’s not a negative change, it’s an admission by BA that they can’t run their operation properly. The issue isn’t the time it takes to connect, it’s the fact that you will arrive late into LHR.

  • Jordan D says:

    You could easily spend 50mins walking from the end of D pier at Schiphol to some of the other piers. Never would work in practice.

  • No Longer Entitled says:

    Surely the primary driver for this is financial. Fewer connections missed = less compensation paid.

    • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

      A few years ago the EU did some research and only approx 2% of flights that came under the regulations ambit actually qualified for some form of EU261 compensation so no it’s not the main driver for this change.

      Delayed baggage is probably a bigger financial and administrative cost to BA when bags but not their owners get delayed.

      • Rhys says:

        It’s not just compensation – duty of care costs rack up quickly too, I’m sure, especially if you miss the last flight of the day. And passenger that misses their connection effectively requires to seats – the one they booked (and missed) and the one they actually make. That is, theoretically, missed revenue.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.