Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

American Express changes the minimum income requirement for the free BA card

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

In 2023, American Express brought back minimum income requirements for its UK personal and small business cards.

Between 2016 and 2023, the company took a more holistic view of your finances. After all, a single person living at home on a £25,000 salary has a totally different disposable income profile to someone who is married with two kids and a mortgage taking home £35,000. This approach ended in 2023.

The company has just tweaked the minimum income requirement for the free British Airways card, following changes made to the other free cards last year. No limits have increased.

American Express changes its minimum income requirements

The previous limits were not exactly tough for anyone in a full time job. Even someone on minimum wage doing 40 hours per week would qualify for every American Express card except The Platinum Card and the British Airways American Express Premium Plus Card.

The winners from these changes are probably the retired or part-time workers, who may now find they earn enough to apply for specific products.

These are the current PERSONAL income requirements:

For the small business cards, the minimum income figure relates to the personal income of the person applying and not the profits of the business itself.

Limits have been falling in real terms for many years

If we go back to 2016, these levels are often substantially lower than they were, adjusting for wage inflation.

The Platinum Card was £40,000 in 2016 but is currently £35,000. With wage inflation it should be nearer £55,000.

The Marriott Bonvoy American Express Card required a £30,000 personal income in 2016 but is now £20,000, when wage inflation should have pushed it to nearer £40,000.

The only jump is the British Airways American Express Premium Plus Card, which was available on a £20,000 income in 2016 but now requires £35,000.

The other personal cards were £20,000 in 2016. Those which have now dropped to £15,000 over the past year would have been nearer £30,000 had the limit kept pace with wages.


earns points from credit cards

Want to earn more points from credit cards? – July 2025 update

If you are looking to apply for a new credit card, here are our top recommendations based on the current sign-up bonuses.

In 2022, Barclaycard launched two exciting new Barclaycard Avios Mastercard cards with a bonus of up to 25,000 Avios. You can apply here.

You qualify for the bonus on these cards even if you have a British Airways American Express card:

Barclaycard Avios Plus card

Barclaycard Avios Plus Mastercard

Get 25,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £10,000 Read our full review

Barclaycard Avios card

Barclaycard Avios Mastercard

Get 5,000 Avios for signing up and an upgrade voucher at £20,000 Read our full review

You can see our full directory of all UK cards which earn airline or hotel points here. Here are the best of the other deals currently available.

American Express Preferred Rewards Gold Credit Card

Your best beginner’s card – 20,000 points, FREE for a year & four airport lounge passes Read our full review

British Airways American Express Premium Plus Card

30,000 Avios and the famous annual Companion Voucher voucher Read our full review

The Platinum Card from American Express

50,000 bonus points and great travel benefits – for a large fee Read our full review

Virgin Atlantic Reward+ Mastercard

18,000 bonus points and 1.5 points for every £1 you spend Read our full review

Earning miles and points from small business cards

If you are a sole trader or run a small company, you may also want to check out these offers:

The American Express Business Platinum Card

50,000 points when you sign-up and an annual £200 Amex Travel credit Read our full review

The American Express Business Gold Card

20,000 points sign-up bonus and FREE for a year Read our full review

Capital on Tap Pro Visa

10,500 points (=10,500 Avios) plus good benefits Read our full review

Capital on Tap Visa

NO annual fee, NO FX fees and points worth 0.8 Avios per £1 Read our full review

British Airways American Express Accelerating Business Card

30,000 Avios sign-up bonus – plus annual bonuses of up to 30,000 Avios Read our full review

Comments (111)

  • NorthernLass says:

    Are lots of people on £15k really going to sign up for the free BA card and spend their annual gross income on it to earn the poor SUB and not-very-valuable companion voucher? Amex would probably be better dropping the income requirement to £25 or £30k for the paid card which gives a much better return.

    • NorthernLass says:

      *£25k, not £25, lol.

    • polly says:

      Just hope they realise their CV only gets them on Y. Could be a disappointment. Many q on here from readers asking this already, not realising what they have signed up for. Beavering away collecting, and still not making J. I would be very disappointed.
      But then again neither BA or AMEX want to hand out too many of those paid J CVs.

    • Rob says:

      You don’t need to earn the voucher. Compared to other cards out there (non travel rewards) 1 Avios per £1 is great.

      • NorthernLass says:

        It might be a decent, earning rate, but if you don’t spend much and therefore can’t earn loads of avios, you’ll get 6k (?) SUB, then 15k avios if you do hit the spend for the voucher and how far are you actually going to get with that, 2 return flights to Spain maybe? I feel like there are better card options for someone in that position.

        • Lumma says:

          A moderate Sainsbury’s shopper can easily get over 20k avios a year just from buying the bonus nectar items each week, sub and a few thousand points from spend and you’ve got a couple of return flights to Spain

    • JDB says:

      It’s already highly problematic having the income requirement for the BAPP as low as £35k when you are required to spend £15k of net income to earn the key benefit of the card.

      • NorthernLass says:

        Problematic in what way? Are there a lot of defaulters on this card? I held it on and off for several years while working part time and earning less than £35k, always spent well over £10k, but of course had access to other household income as do many other people.

        • JDB says:

          Problematic in meeting the FCA’s product suitability and value for money requirements. If you had a gross salary of £35,000 that leaves you about £28,750 net out of which you need to spend £15k over half to obtain the voucher. That makes the income requirement absurdly low.

      • Ken says:

        It’s probably only you who sees it as problematic.

        A pensioner with income of £35k living in a mortgage free house perhaps with a partner with their own income. Spend £1200 a month on shopping, some bills, car running costs, entertainment and travel ?

        What’s problematic about that ?

        I don’t imagine it’s the right card for someone on £35k paying a student loan , rent of £1200 a month snd saving for a deposit- but then why would they get it ?

        • JDB says:

          @Ken – I think you will find it’s Amex that finds it problematic, nothing to do with what I think. Amex would rather have a lower limit on the BAPP but, as things stand today, they can’t and the £35k was already tight when a £10k spend was required.

        • John says:

          I got my first Amexes as a student… lots of manufactured spending opportunities back then, occasionally spent more in one month than my reported annual income. Can’t do that these days 🙂

      • QFFlyer says:

        But probably quite good for Amex, there’s plenty of scope for breakage there – people will pay the annual fee, because it’s got an aspirational benefit, but for whatever reason may not keep track, or just not have the means to spend anywhere near enough to trigger the voucher, which is then something Amex don’t have to pay for /cynic

  • danimal says:

    Given that CC companies can only ask the self-reported income of an applicant, what is the point of this rule (/rule change)? Surely they use the credit reference agencies’ reports to make a decision?

    • JDB says:

      Card providers have plenty of ways of cross checking the truthfulness of someone’s stated income on their application plus they rely upon the fact that most people realise the seriousness of giving false information for the obtention of credit. Credit reference agencies are a very basic form of check but beyond that each card company uses its own parameters to consider credit applications.

    • Rui N. says:

      They basically bet that 99.x% of the people will tell the truth. From the rest, most will be white lies just to get a higher credit limit and they won’t be problematic. The remaining they hope that the cross check will catch most of them.
      From experience here, personal and acquaintances Amex also seems now to do a lot of approve>block card after few transactions> then ask for payslips.

      • Lumma says:

        What should you do after a significant pay increase? Put your new salary on the application form and hope they don’t flag it? Or put your old salary and hope it’s enough?

        • Rui N. says:

          Don’t understand why would you put an old salary.

        • John says:

          Don’t apply for a credit card one day before your pay increase using your old income figure and then apply for another card the next day using the new figure.

          • QFFlyer says:

            I’ve never understood why, in the UK, I’ve never once been asked to prove my income. I don’t lie about it, but equally they don’t see it (it get paid into an overseas bank account). Meanwhile, every Australian CC I’ve ever applied for asks for the two most recent payslips.

      • Ken says:

        I’ve never met any group of people where 99% of people are truthful, never mind with the anonymity that an online application brings.

        If in doubt use 80% – and that’s optimistic.

  • Lady London says:

    @BBbetter people on HfP really are in quite different circumstamces to anyone on state pension only – and that’s without being things like financial advisers or other finsnce professionals who simply don’t encounter ordinary people on things like state pension only – or whatever lesser part of it the person has managed to qialify for.

    Future pensioners will be better off but existing pensioners and some still not yet pensioners have it a lot harder on the whole and this will continue in the decades of those curremt amd soon to be pensioners lives. By definition a financial adviser is not going to meet people without savings in low income or precarious situations and regardless of tje view from an HfP reader’s comfortable situation, many of these people will still be in their retirement in the years and decades to come.

  • Nick G says:

    Came here for the comments and wasn’t disappointed!

    Though I do agree it doesn’t make sense for everyone you have to apply to the biggest biffs out there who have no clue about their personal spending and finances. There has to be some rules around income and lending otherwise it would be free for all “you shouldn’t have leant me £X amount”.

    In my first year of the platinum I’ve been given a huge amount of credit which on my income doesn’t make sense but as I’ve never missed a payment ever on any card and been with Amex donkeys years every little helps on my risk profile?

    I’ll get my popcorn again…

  • QFFlyer says:

    What a ridiculous comment – quite simply, if you don’t earn enough to spend or otherwise justify any fee, ability to meet spend criteria for SUB, or find value in the points earned, don’t open the account – anyone would think Amex are forcing you to hold these cards.

  • Garethgerry says:

    @rob certainly has it in for pensioners.

    What @Rob misses is that us pensioners with savings have paid far more tax in our lifetimes . He quotes the person on £ 35000 will get more in pension than they pay in tax. Yes as they hardly pay any tax. The bottom 50 % on earners pay 12% of tax. The top 10% pay 65% of tax and pay in far more than they will get out in pension. Those of us on PAYE , just had to pay up. If @Rob isn’t paying far more tax than he will be getting in pension , then HFP is either less profitable than I think, or he’s got good accountants.

    Even though I’m a pensioner HMRC still take far far more off me than government gives me. I’m not complaining I know I’m comfortable, not lucky as that sounds as if we didn’t work for it.

Leave a Reply to danimal Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.